Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.60 seconds)
Documents citing The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs A.K. Puri & Ors. on 24 March, 2014

Smt. Anuradha Bhattacharya vs Sh. Satyajeet on 16 December, 2014

38. The petitioner is thus awarded Rs.16,50,000/­(Rs.Sixteen Lacs Fifty Thousand only) with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum in view of judgment of Rajesh and others V.Rajbir Singh(supra) from the date of filing of petition till its realisation including, interim award, if any already passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents. Petitioner no.2 is the minor sister of deceased. Petitioner no.1/PW3 stated in the cross­examination that she is earning and her daughters were dependent on her. Petitioner no.3 is the maternal grand mother of deceased, hence it can not be said that she was dependent on deceased. The petitioner/PW3 stated in the cross­examination that the father of victim is not staying with her and she has remarried to Sh.Deeptiman Bhattacharya and she is supporting her daughter. The petitioners have also filed on record an affidavit dated 16.08.2013 of Sh.Krishan Kapoor biological father of deceased as per which deceased Ms.Sneha Kapoor was born on 02.10.1987 from his wedlock with petitioner no.1 and they divorced by mutual consent on 03.08.2002 and the custody of deceased was handed over to petitioner no.1 and he has no objection to decree or compensation being awarded in favour of petitioner no.1.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sushila Pandey vs Ms. Pooja Mehta on 21 July, 2014

28. The petitioners are thus awarded Rs.15,80,640/­(Rs.Fifteen Lacs Eighty Thousand Six Hundred Forty only) with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum in view of judgment of Rajesh and others V.Rajbir Singh(supra) from the date of filing of petition till its realisation including, interim award, if any already passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.Petitioner no.2 the father of deceased can not be considered a dependent on deceased in view of judgment of Sarla Verma and Ors. vs Delhi Transport Corporation and Another (supra).In the circumstances entire amount is awarded in favour of petitioner no.1 mother of deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Accident Claims Tribunal­02 : ... vs Sh. Mange Ram on 13 March, 2015

33. The Hon'ble High Court in recent judgment titled as The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sh. A.K. Puri & Ors, reported in 2012 VI AD(S.C.) 399 decided on 24.03.2014 which was duly circulated to the Judicial Officers for the applying the ratio of this judgment for the purpose of multiplier wherein the Hon'ble High Court as referred Reshma Kumari and relevant para is Page No.14/27 Consolidated Cases bearing No. 383/14 & 382/14 para no. 23 which read as under :
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kamlesh Kumari vs Sh. Sukhdarshan Jindal on 26 April, 2014

In view of judgment of Hon'ble High Court in The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. A.K.Puri & Ors, M.A.C. App. No.196/13 the multiplier shall be applicable as per age of deceased. Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, mother of deceased appeared in witness box as PW3 and adduced evidence by way of affidavit Ex.PW3/A. In order to prove the age of deceased the petitioner has filed on record the copy of driving licence of deceased Ex.PW3/4 as per which the date of birth of deceased was 08.07.1985.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Joginder Singh vs Sh. Daulat Ram Yadav on 30 April, 2014

In view of judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi 13 in The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. A.K.Puri & Ors, M.A.C. App. No.196/13 the multiplier shall be applicable as per age of deceased. In order to prove the age of deceased the claimants have relied on copy of Aadhar Card of deceased and their ration card wherein the year of birth of Sh. Ravinder Singh is mentioned as 1986.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Pushpa Devi vs Surjeet Kumar Thakur on 24 May, 2014

The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in recent judgment in MAC Appeal no. 196/13 in case titled as The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. K. Puri & Ors vide judgment delivered on 24.03.2014 has been pleased to give further guidance for just and proper adjudication of compensation. Accordingly, in the present case, the L.Rs of the deceased are entitled to a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/­ as compensation on account of loss of love and affection.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Warish Ahmed S/O Late Abdul Shakoor vs Sh. Chaman Lal S/O Sh. Beli Ram on 2 June, 2014

28. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in recent judgment in MAC Appeal No. 196/13 in case titled as The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A.K.Puri & Ors. vide judgment delivered on 24.03.14 has been pleased to give further guidance for just and proper adjudication of compensation. Accordingly, the claimants are entitled to a sum of Rs. 1 lakh towards loss of love and affection. Also the claimants shall be entitled to an amount of Rs 10,000/­ towards loss of estate. A sum of Rs. 25,000/­ is also granted for loss of consortium to petitioner no. 1. Thus, the total compensation awarded to petitioners is detailed as below:­
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next