Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.21 seconds)
Documents citing K.Vasudevan vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 15 March, 2022

D.Selvakumar vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 9 September, 2022

43. It is needless to state that any observations or judgments of the High Court running counter to the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India have denuded to loose its status as precedent. Thus, the ratio decidendi repeatedly reiterated in unequivocal terms by the Apex Court of India are to be followed in the matter of passing of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET), which is the requisite qualification for appointment of teachers as per the regulations. Requisite qualifications cannot be dispensed with at any circumstances in favour of any Educational Institution, whether minority or majority. Thus, the educational qualifications prescribed by the State pursuant to the regulations issued by the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) is to be scrupulously implemented for the purpose of considering the proposals for approval of appointment by Educational Authorities. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Madras High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 1 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

Sr.S.Arul Ananda Rosi vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 27 September, 2022

43. It is needless to state that any observations or judgments of the High Court running counter to the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India have denuded to loose its status as precedent. Thus, the ratio decidendi repeatedly reiterated in unequivocal terms by the Apex Court of India are to be followed in the matter of passing of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET), which is the requisite qualification for appointment of Teachers as per the regulations. Requisite qualifications cannot be dispensed with at any circumstances in favour of any Educational Institution, whether minority or majority. Thus, the educational qualifications prescribed by the State pursuant 43/46 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5439 of 2017 and etc., batch to the regulations issued by the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) is to be scrupulously implemented for the purpose of considering the proposals for approval of appointment by Educational Authorities.
Madras High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

Mr.S.Elumalai vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 26 September, 2022

47. It is needless to state that any observations or judgments of the High Court running counter to the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India have denuded to loose its status as precedent. Thus, the ratio decidendi repeatedly reiterated in unequivocal terms by the Apex Court of India are to be followed in the matter of passing of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET), which is the requisite qualification for appointment of teachers as per the regulations. Requisite qualifications cannot be dispensed with at any circumstances in favour of any Educational Institution, whether minority or majority. Thus, the educational qualifications prescribed by the State pursuant to the regulations issued by the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) is to be scrupulously implemented for the purpose of considering the proposals for approval of appointment by Educational Authorities.
Madras High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

N.Amrinabanu vs The Secretary To Government on 11 October, 2022

44. It is needless to state that any observations or judgments of the High Court running counter to the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India have denuded to loose its status as precedent. Thus, the ratio decidendi repeatedly reiterated in unequivocal terms by the Apex Court of India are to be followed in the matter of passing of the Teachers Page 46 of 49 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21221 of 2018 Eligibility Test (TET), which is the requisite qualification for appointment of teachers as per the regulations. Requisite qualifications cannot be dispensed with at any circumstances in favour of any Educational Institution, whether minority or majority. Thus, the educational qualifications prescribed by the State pursuant to the regulations issued by the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) is to be scrupulously implemented for the purpose of considering the proposals for approval of appointment by Educational Authorities.
Madras High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

P.Menaka vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 16 September, 2022

43. It is needless to state that any observations or judgments of the High Court running counter to the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India have denuded to loose its status as precedent. Thus, the ratio decidendi repeatedly reiterated in unequivocal terms by the Apex Court of India are to be followed in the matter of passing of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET), which is the requisite qualification for appointment of teachers as per the regulations. Requisite qualifications cannot be dispensed with at any circumstances in favour of any Educational Institution, whether minority or majority. Thus, the educational qualifications prescribed by the State pursuant to the regulations issued by the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) is to be scrupulously implemented for the purpose of considering the proposals for approval of appointment by Educational Authorities.
Madras High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

K.Bhuvaneswari vs The Principal Secretary / The State ... on 29 September, 2022

43. It is needless to state that any observations or judgments of the High Court running counter to the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India have denuded to loose its status as precedent. Thus, the ratio decidendi repeatedly reiterated in unequivocal terms by the Apex Court of India are to be followed in the matter of passing of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET), which is the requisite qualification for appointment of teachers as per the regulations. Requisite qualifications cannot be dispensed with at any circumstances in favour of any Educational Institution, whether Page 43 of 45 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.27830 of 2017 and etc minority or majority. Thus, the educational qualifications prescribed by the State pursuant to the regulations issued by the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) is to be scrupulously implemented for the purpose of considering the proposals for approval of appointment by Educational Authorities.
Madras High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

R.Sakthivel vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 11 July, 2022

In the light of the earlier decision of this Court in K.Vasudevan's case [W.P.Nos.28284 of 2022 etc., batch dated 07.04.2022] as well as the order dated 19.10.2022 made in Rev.Appl.(Writ) No.131/2022, teachers, who do not possess the minimum qualification of pass in TET are not entitled to continue in service in the schools/educational institutions. While that being so, the claim of the petitioners in W.P.No.19587 of 2022, who are seeking promotion to the post of B.T. Assistants and Headmasters in High Schools, is liable to be rejected. This Court finds some force in the contention of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 59 W.P.Nos.17895 and 19587 of 2022 petitioner in W.P.No.17895 of 2022 and therefore, the impugned notification of the second respondent to conduct promotion counselling is liable to be quashed.
Madras High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - D Krishnakumar - Full Document

R.Sakthivel vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 11 July, 2022

In the light of the earlier decision of this Court in K.Vasudevan's case [W.P.Nos.28284 of 2022 etc., batch dated 07.04.2022] as well as the order dated 19.10.2022 made in Rev.Appl.(Writ) No.131/2022, teachers, who do not possess the minimum qualification of pass in TET are not entitled to continue in service in the schools/educational institutions. While that being so, the claim of the petitioners in W.P.No.19587 of 2022, who are seeking promotion to the post of B.T. Assistants and Headmasters in High Schools, is liable to be rejected. This Court finds some force in the contention of the petitioner in W.P.No.17895 of 2022 and therefore, the impugned notification of the second respondent to conduct promotion counselling is liable to be quashed.
Madras High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - D Krishnakumar - Full Document
1