New Gujarat Tin Printing Works, Baroda vs Assessee on 29 September, 2010
(viii) C.I.T. vs. S. Rajamani & Thangarajan Industries
(2000)241 ITR 668(Mad.)
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.93 seconds)Documents citing
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S. Rajamani & Thangarajan Industries on 8 November, 1997
Raja Fertilizers, Trichy vs Assessee on 7 January, 2013
7. We heard Shri V.D.Gopal, the learned counsel
appearing for the assessee. The learned counsel relied on the
decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court rendered in the case
of CIT vs. S.Rajamani and Thangarajan Industries, 241 ITR 668.
He explained that the facts relating to the above case are exactly
similar to the facts of the present case and as such the said
decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court is applicable to the
assessee's case and accordingly the firm should not have been
assessed to long-term capital gains.
K.R.Muralidhar, Chennai vs Assessee on 26 June, 2015
Therefore,
this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the judgment of
Madras High Court in S. Rajamani & Thangarajan Industries (supra)
and this Tribunal's decision in Raja Fertilizers (supra) may not be
applicable to the facts of the case.
1