Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 70 (2.58 seconds)
Documents citing Goa Foundation & Anr vs State Of Goa & Anr on 29 March, 2016

Ramakrishna Prasad vs D/O Personnel &Amp Administrative ... on 5 March, 2020

56) Rebutting the argument of Mr. Datar that by making the impugned provision mandatory the Legislature had acted contrary to the judgments of this Court, Mr. Rohatgi argued that this argument was devoid of any merit on various counts: First, there was no judgment of this Court and the orders referred were only interim orders. Secondly, in any case, those orders were passed at a time when Aadhaar was being implemented as a scheme in administrative/executive domain and the Court was considering the validity of Aadhaar scheme in that hue/background. Those orders have not been passed in the context of examining the validity of any legislative measure. Thirdly, no final view is taken in the form of any judgment that Aadhaar is unconstitutional and, therefore, there is no basis in existence which was required to be removed. Fourthly, the Parliament was competent to pass the law and provide statutory framework to give legislative backing to Aadhaar in the absence of any such law which existed at that time. He, thus, submitted that there was no question of curing the alleged basis of judgment/interim orders by legislation. He specifically relied upon the following passage from the judgment in the case of Goa Foundation & Anr. v. State of Goa & Anr.27:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 127 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next