Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14012 (1.40 seconds)
Documents citing Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 23 March, 2009

Brahm Singh & 2 Others vs State Of U.P. & 2 Others on 8 July, 2016

Moreover, there is no material before us to accept the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners in the instant case that the law which has been propounded by 7 Judges' Bench decision in the case of Amrawati and another Versus State of U.P.(supra) as also approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh versus State of U.P. (supra) are not being followed in the State of U.P. also appears to be not correct as we have not come across any such case that law of 7 Judges' Bench decision in the case of Amrawati and another Versus State of U.P.(supra) as also approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh versus State of U.P. (supra) has been placed by the accused before court below and the same was not complied with by the courts below. Therefore, said prayer is also hereby refused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - R Sinha - Full Document

Lalla Ram & Others vs State Of U.P. & Another on 9 December, 2020

In the light of above, it is directed that in case the applicants surrender before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Lakhimpur Kheri within ten day's from today, then their application for bail shall be considered and disposed of in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., (2009) 4 SCC 437.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Munawwar And 9 Ors vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 July, 2014

However, in view of the above submissions made by the learned members of the Bar, a fresh direction is again being issued to the courts below through the District Judges concerned throughout the State of U.P. to follow the law laid down by the Apex Court in the matter of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh (supra) as well as the Full Bench decision of this Court in the matter of Smt. Amrawati (supra) in letter and spirit which has also been approved by the Apex Court, which directions are to be transmitted to all the District Judges of the State through the Registrar General of this Court forthwith.
Allahabad High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Shri Venkata Sarveasam Sastry ... vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors on 1 May, 2015

In Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others37 the Supreme Court had an occasion to specifically deal with an argument that once the charge sheet is filed, power of quashing the FIR/charge sheet should not be exercised, however, the Supreme Court proceeded to examine the merits on the basis of materials in the charge sheet without holding that the petition for quashing FIR is not maintainable after filing of the charge sheet. The Supreme Court ultimately found that the charge sheet, prima facie, discloses commission of an offence.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 60 - Cited by 1 - P K Mishra - Full Document

Ami Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 September, 2020

(2). However, following the decision of this Court in the case of Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors., we reiterate that a Court hearing a regular bail application has got inherent power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application. In our opinion, this is the proper view in view of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which protects the life and liberty of every person.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Ami Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 September, 2020

(2). However, following the decision of this Court in the case of Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors., we reiterate that a Court hearing a regular bail application has got inherent power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application. In our opinion, this is the proper view in view of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which protects the life and liberty of every person.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Ami Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 September, 2020

(2). However, following the decision of this Court in the case of Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors., we reiterate that a Court hearing a regular bail application has got inherent power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application. In our opinion, this is the proper view in view of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which protects the life and liberty of every person.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Arvind Kejriwal vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. ... on 16 January, 2023

13. Thereafter, learned counsel for the petitioner has given undertaking that the present applicant is ready to appear personally in the court and file the bail bonds, therefore, some protection may be given to him. Considering that request, this Court granted four weeks' time to the present applicant to surrender before the learned court below and file application for bail and the same was directed to be considered and disposed of strictly in accordance with law in terms of the law laid down in the case of Smt. Amrawati and another vs. State of U.P., 2005; Cr.L.J.755, which has been affirmed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors., (2009) 4 SCC 437.
Allahabad High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - R S Chauhan - Full Document

Ami Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 September, 2020

(2). However, following the decision of this Court in the case of Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors., we reiterate that a Court hearing a regular bail application has got inherent power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application. In our opinion, this is the proper view in view of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which protects the life and liberty of every person.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Ami Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 September, 2020

(2). However, following the decision of this Court in the case of Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors., we reiterate that a Court hearing a regular bail application has got inherent power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application. In our opinion, this is the proper view in view of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which protects the life and liberty of every person.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next