Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.59 seconds)
Documents citing Anchit Sachdeva & Anr vs Smt Sudesh Sachdeva & Ors on 1 June, 2022

Jiya Sharma Minor Through Her Mother ... vs Mr Deepak Sharma & Ors. on 8 April, 2025

6. Learned counsel for the defendants places reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Yudhishter vs. Ashok Kumar 1, the decisions of this Court in the cases of Sunny (Minor) & Anr. Vs. Sh. Raj Singh & Ors.2, Sagar Gambhir vs. Sukhdev Singh Gambhir (Since Deceased) Thr His Legal 3, Mrs. Anita Gandoak vs. Shri Harkirat Singh Sodhi & Anr., 4, Neeraj Bhatia vs. Ravindra Kumar Bhatia and Ors., 5, 1 (1987) 1 SCC 204 2 2015 SCC OnLine Del 13446 3 RFA(OS) 46/2016 dated 06.03.2017 4 2024 DHC 381 passed in CS(OS) 90/2017 5 2024 SCC OnLine Del 4894 Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRIYA Signed Signing Date:09.04.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 18:47:03 6 KUMAR KAURAV Anchit Sachdeva & Anr. Vs. Smt. Sudesh Sachdeva & Ors 6, and Harmanpreet Kaur Dhir vs. Pritam Singh Bhatia 7.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Gagandeep Kaur vs Rattandeep Singh Grover & Ors on 2 July, 2025

This plea is clearly an afterthought and is inconsistent with the plaintiffs own claim that late Sh. Chanchal Singh was the de facto owner of the properties in his individual capacity. Reliance is palced on the decision in the case of Sagar Gambhir v. Sukhdev Singh Gambhir3, Sagar Gambhir vs. Sukhdev Singh Gambhir (Deceased) through LRs & Anr4 and Anchit Sachdeva & Anr. vs. Sudesh Sachdeva & Ors5.
Delhi High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Nand Kumar Newar vs Kamal Kumar Newar on 10 October, 2025

Perusal of the said judgment shows that in the judgment Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has extensively discussed the law pertaining to HUF property and co-parcenery property. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in this case reiterated that there is no presumption that a family, because it is joint, possesses joint property or any property. When in a suit for partition, a party claims that any particular item of the CS (OS) No.362/2009, New CS DJ 537/2025 Nand Kumar Newar Vs. Kamal Kumar Newar Page 25 / 32 property is joint family property, the burden of proving it rests on the party asserting it.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanak Trakru & Anr vs Renu Trakru Singla & Ors on 28 January, 2026

3.1 The contention is that the plaintiffs being the children of Signature Not Verified Signed By:AWANISHCS(OS) 216/2025 Page 2 of 9 CHANDRA MISHRA Signing Date:28.01.2026 15:30:16 defendant no. 2 and the grandchildren of Sh. Avtar Krishen Trakru cannot seek partition during the lifetime of defendant no. 2 and that there is no cause of action to file the suit. Decision of this court in Anchit Sachdeva & Anr. vs. Sudesh Sachdeva & Ors. 2024 SCC Online Del 8768 is relied upon.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1