Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.22 seconds)

Smt. Indrani Bhattacharjee vs M/S Banerjee Associates on 18 November, 2014

The Learned Counsel for the Complainant has submitted that the flat in question belonged to Smt. Mohua Dutta who cancelled her agreement for purchase. It is contended that out of the consideration of Rs.15 lakh the Complainant in all paid Rs.7,40,000/-. It is submitted that there is a declaration made by OP No.1 being Annexure-H with the promise to transfer the flat within one month from 04/12/09 in favour of the Complainant. It is submitted that power of attorney was executed by the Land Owners and OP No.1 did not adduce any evidence. The Learned Counsel for the Complainant has referred to the decision reported in AIR 1973 Patna 299 [Birendra Mohan Ghosh vs. Mohamed Umar]. It is submitted that Smt. Manju Das signed in the development agreement and also in the power of attorney. It is contended that it was the undivided property of the heirs of Chittaranjan Dutta and the Complainant purchased from the Developers allocation and as per terms of agreement the Landlords will not interfere with the actions of the Developer and will sign the deed as confirming party. It is contended that as per Annexure-B, that is, agreement for sale the Developer is the Constituted Attorney and the omission of the name of Smt. Manju Das in the agreement for sale is immaterial as all the Land Owners executed the power of attorney and the Developer is the Constituted Attorney of the Land Owners.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1