Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.35 seconds)

Sakunthalammal vs Chandrasekar Reddiar And Ors. on 29 September, 1966

Even prior to the notice there has been a protest against the conversion of the residential premises into business premises. It is years after the notice the suit has been filed and the defendants who have not even replied to the notice have had ample opportunity to remedy the breach before the suit. But I am afraid that a statutory requirement if mandatory cannot be got round by these considerations. Of course, it is not contended for the defendants that there must be two independent notices, one under section 111(g) and another under section 114-A, in view of the decision of this court in Mrs. Margaret v. G.A.R. Spain, .
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1