State vs Kartar Singh @ Ravi on 16 August, 2024
8. On the other hand, Mr. S.P. Dhankar, Ld. Counsel
for both accused persons have argued that accused persons have
been falsely implicated. Further, testimony of police witnesses
cannot be relied upon. It was also argued that the weapon of
offence i.e. the knife has not been recovered and the injury, if
any, is self inflicted. That the accused has been falsely
implicated by the complainant to escape from the consequences
of the cross FIR bearing no.1009/2016 Which had been
Digitally signed
SHEFALI by SHEFALI
SHARMA
SC No. 759/17, FIR No. 1010/2016 PS KNK Marg SHARMA Date: 2024.08.16
18:00:29 +0530
State Vs. Kartar Singh Etc.
Page No. 10 of 20
-:11:-
registered against the complainant party and the present case is
merely an afterthought. That the prosecution has failed to prove
the case beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, both the accused
persons deserve acquittal.