C.M.S & Other vs Pooran Chand Agarwal on 19 May, 2023
15. From the foregoing discussion would lead to the only
irresistible conclusion that the repudiation of the claim of the
complaint was unjustified and the complainant had filed his
evidence by affidavit and filed and relied upon the discharged
summary and final discharged bills issued by doctor of Sir
Ganga Ram Hospital. The complainant aged about 84 years
old, who had to spend his hard-earned savings, while
undergoing treatment to save his as well his wife life, cannot be
simply told that, since the complainant has failed to abide by
the Railway Board Policy dated 31.01.2007, issued by
competent authority with the consultation of experts that "CMD
of Zone railway can obtain special permission from railway
board for treatment in private hospital of a beneficiary who is
under treatment (since last 15 years and there is no scope
available for railway beneficiaries to go any private hospital on
DISMISSED PAGE 6 OF 15
FA/7/2023 D.O.D.: 19.05.2023
C.M.S. & ORS. VS. POORAN CHAND AGARWAL
their own violation except in case of real emergency situation."