Shitla Prasad vs M. Saidullah And Ors. on 3 April, 1975
do not apply to the facts of the present case. He urged that this distinction between the cancellation of an agreement under Clauses 16 and 19 was clearly brought out by another Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Autar Santosh Kumar Ltd. v. B. B. Saksena, Civil Misc. Writ No. 5123 of 1973, decided on 19-10-1973 (All), wherein a similar agreement had been cancelled by the District Magistrate in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by Clause 16 of the agreement.