Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)

Bhupendrabhai Devjibhai Chauhan vs State Of Gujarat on 7 October, 2021

10.1 Yet another decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Raghavbhai Arjanbhai & Anr., v Amreli Nagar Palika & Anr., reported in 1994 (1) GLH 470 is also on the issue of exercise of jurisdiction under Section 258 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act and the relevant observations contained therein, deserve to be considered, which has indicated that the Resolution once passed by the Municipality and when acted upon by the third parties, the Collector cannot exercise jurisdiction. Now, here, in the instant case as well, the Resolutions which have been passed ranging from the year 2012 to July, 2014 are already implemented and third parties i.e. allottees have acted upon the same and at that stage after almost a period of three years, the Collector has exercised powers under Section 258 of the Act, which appears to be in conflict with the proposition which has been laid down by the Division Bench of this Court, the relevant observations contained in the said decision of the Division Bench, the Court would like to reproduce the same hereunder :-
Gujarat High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A J Shastri - Full Document

Manjulaben Rameshchandra Barot And ... vs Collector Of Mehsana And Ors. on 27 July, 1995

It cannot be gainsaid that a part would not mean the entirety. A part is certainly not the whole thing. In that view of the matter, there is no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the Resolutions passed by the outgoing Administrator were not implemented. The aforesaid binding Division Bench ruling of this Court in the case of Raghavbhai (supra) will not, therefore, assist the petitioners in this case.
Gujarat High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1