Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (6.14 seconds)
Documents citing Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence vs Amit Kumar on 22 November, 2016

Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence vs M/S Prk Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. on 24 April, 2019

14. Reliance was also placed on behalf of the petitioner on the verdict of this Court in Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Amit Kumar: Criminal M.C. No. 5320/2013, a verdict dated 22.11.2016 wherein the release directed on superdari of a vehicle a Toyota Crl.M.C. Nos. 4316/2016 and 4767/16 Page 19 of 48 Fortuner from which 95.350 Kg. of a contraband substance were recovered by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Officers was held to be erroneous observing to the effect that the matter related to commission of an offence punishable under the NDPS Act, 1985 which was a special law and the offence committed had to be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Special law and the directions were thus made vide the judgment dated 22.11.2016 for surrender of the vehicle make Toyota Fortuner which had been allowed to be released.
Delhi High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 8 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Bishwajit Dey vs The State Of Assam on 7 January, 2025

13. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-State of Assam submitted that the NDPS Act, which deals with drug trafficking, is a special enactment and a complete code in itself. [See: Noor Aga vs. State of Punjab & Another, (2008) 16 SCC 417; Mukesh Singh vs. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi), (2020) 10 SCC 120 and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence vs. Amit Kumar, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6083]. According to her, the NDPS Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 13370/2024 Page 13 of 31 Act does not – unlike the Code of Criminal Procedure – contemplate interim release of a seized conveyance during pendency of the trial.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document
1