Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 438 (3.07 seconds)
Documents citing Arvind Kumar & Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 July, 2007

Sh. Arvind Kumar vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 12 January, 2012

It has to be noticed that the Magistrate was not bound to take cognizance of the offences on receipt of the complaint. He could have, without taking cognizance, directed an investigation of the case by the police under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once however he took cognizance he could order investigation by the police only under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and not under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As it is clear here from the very fact that he took action under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, that he had taken cognizance of the offences mentioned in the complaint, it was open to Arvind Kumar Vs The State 7 him to order investigation only under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and not under Section 156(3) of the Code."
Delhi District Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 February, 2020

In his cross-examination, he states in para-8 that he had named each of the appellants by name in FIR, however the FIR Ex.P/2 is in the name of unknown person. The evidence of complainant has been recorded more than a year after the incident and no test identification parade was 5 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.8877 OF 2019 (Ravi vs State of Madhya Pradesh) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.9801 OF 2019 (Arvind vs State of Madhya Pradesh) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.10447 OF 2019 (Deepak @ Majbut vs State of Madhya Pradesh) carried out when the FIR is registered against the unknown persons and it was important to carried out the test identification parade. The Dock identification can of-course be the basis for conviction, however for doing so the evidence of complainant needs to be unimpeachable and the prosecution should also show that there are no lapses in the investigation. The complainant states that one of the accused had put red chilli powder in his eyes and he felt burning sensation in the eyes. However, the Investigating Officer (IO) Mr. Siniya Sengar (PW/16) in para 18 admits that eyes of the complainant looked normal. The prosecution has not examined the Doctor who conducted the MLC of complainant. A perusal of such MLC which is placed on record, though not exhibited shows no injury to the eyes. The complainant states that his purse was also looted but the purse which was shown to be seized from the accused- Deepak has not been shown to the complainant and no test identification of the purse has been conducted. Thus, it cannot be stated that purse is belonging to accused-Deepak. As against accused-Ravi, the accusation was that he had pointed out Katta at complainant. However, the complainant Rakesh Meena (PW/3) in para 11 of his cross-examination he states that he does not know as to which of the accused has pointed Katta at him.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Shukla - Full Document

Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 July, 2020

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH CRA.No.11100/2019 (Arvind and Another Vs. State of M.P.) It is submitted by the counsel for the appellants that as per prosecution story, complainant lodged FIR on 29.08.2016 against the present appellants at Police Station Pohri, District Shivpuri regarding the incident before one month and offence registered under Sections 376, 342, 506/34 of IPC. The prosecutrix stated that she was 15 years old. When she went to toilet at 4:30 am, suddenly both the appellants came and brought her in the house of Sarpanch and committed rape over her and told her that if she informs anyone, they will kill her parents. It is further submitted that the trial Court has erred in not acquitting the appellant No.2 while looking to the evidence and the witnesses, the appellant should have been acquitted. Ten witnesses have been examined. The statements of the witnesses are very much contrary to each other. The prosecutrix and her parents filed the compromise application before the trial Court, but the trial Court ignored the compromise application and convicted the appellants. The prosecutrix accepted her court's statement that she is more than 18 years at the time of incident. It is further submitted that sentence of the appellant No.1 Arvind has been suspended by this Court vide order dated 01.06.2020. It is also submitted that the incident was registered after 40 days without there being proper explanation of the same.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Karan @ Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 July, 2021

10. ,rn~ }kjk ;g funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosnd 10 ikS/kksa dk ¼;FkklaHko dksbZ Hkh Qy nsus okys isM+ vFkok uhe@ihiy tSls isM+½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mls vius vkl iM+ksl esa isM+ksa dh lqj{kk dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks lqjf{kr jg ldsA vkosnd dk ;g drZO; gS fd u dsoy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^ vkosnd laHkor% 6&8 QhV ÅWaps ikS/ks@isM+ksa dks 3&4 QhV xM~<k djds yxk;sxk rkfd os 'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds fy,] vkosnd dks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k o`{kksas@ikS/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djuk gksxsaA rRi'pkr~] fopkj.k ds lekiu rd gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr fjiksVZ çLrqr dh tk,xh A o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk drZO; gS D;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky; vuqikyu ds ckjs esa vkosnd }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks utj vankt ugh dj ldrk gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr vkSj vkosnd }kjk vuqikyu ds laca/k esa ,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy, funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkonsd }kjk fd;s x;s vuqikyu dh ,d la{kfIr fjiskVZ bl U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rhu ekg esa ¼vxys N% eghuksa ds fy,½ j[kh tk;sxh ftls fd ^^funsZ'k^^ 'kh"kZ ds varxZr j[kk tk,xkA o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosnd dh vksj ls dh xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA vkosnd dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/kksa@isMksa dks jksius dh Lora=rk gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+ yxkdj j{kk djuk pkgrk gS] rks og vius Loa; ds O;; ij ;g djus HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 6 M.Cr.C.No.32034/2021 (Karan alias Arvind Vs. State of M.P.)
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - A Pathak - Full Document

Banti Alias Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 September, 2019

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 4 M.Cr.C. No.38931/2019 (Banti alias Arvind Vs. State of M.P.) A copy of this order be sent to CMHO, Shivpuri /Hospital Superintendent for information and ensuring compliance of this order. CMHO / Hospital Superintendent, Shivpuri may inform the Registry of this Court, if any default is made by the applicant. Even otherwise, CMHO/Hospital Superintendent as the case may be, may submit a report about the conduct and the work done by the applicant every month, which shall be kept under the caption "Direction". The report may be submitted in November, 2019. On the other hand, applicant shall also have to submit a report about his experience of community service before this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under the caption "Direction".
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raghvendra @ Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 July, 2021

,rn~ }kjk ;g funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosnd 02 ikS/kksa dk HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 3 Cr.A.No.4585/2020 Raghvendra alias Arvind and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. ¼;FkklaHko dksbZ Hkh Qy nsus okys isM+ vFkok uhe@ihiy tSls isM+½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mls vius vkl iM+ksl esa isM+ksa dh lqj{kk dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks lqjf{kr jg ldsA vkosnd dk ;g drZO; gS fd u dsoy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^ vkosnd laHkor% 6&8 QhV ÅWaps ikS/ks@isM+ksa dks 3&4 QhV xM~<k djds yxk;sxk rkfd os 'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds fy,] vkosnd dks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k o`{kksas@ikS/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djuk gksxsaA rRi'pkr~] fopkj.k ds lekiu rd gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr fjiksVZ çLrqr dh tk,xh A o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk drZO; gS D;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky; vuqikyu ds ckjs esa vkosnd }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks utj vankt ugh dj ldrk gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr vkSj vkosnd }kjk vuqikyu ds lac/a k esa ,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy, funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkonsd }kjk fd;s x;s vuqikyu dh ,d la{kfIr fjiskVZ bl U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rhu ekg esa ¼vxys N% eghuksa ds fy,½ j[kh tk;sxh ftls fd ^^funsZ'k^^ 'kh"kZ ds varxZr j[kk tk,xkA o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosnd dh vksj ls dh xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA vkosnd dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/kksa@isMksa dks jksius dh HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 4 Cr.A.No.4585/2020 Raghvendra alias Arvind and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. Lora=rk gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+ yxkdj j{kk djuk pkgrk gS] rks og vius Loa; ds O;; ij ;g djus ds fy;s Lora= gksxkA bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g funsZ'k ,d ijh{k.k izdj.k ds rkSj ij fn, x, gSa rkfd fgalk vkSj cqjkbZ ds fopkj dk izfrdkj] l`tu ,oa izd`fr ds lkFk ,dkdkj gksus ds ek/;e ls lkeaktL; LFkkfir fd;k tk ldsA orZeku esa ekuo vfLrRo ds vko';d vax ds :i esa n;k] lsok] izse ,oaa d:a.kk dh izd`fr dks fodflr djus dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd ;g ekuo thou dh ewyHkwr izo`fr;ka gSa vkSj ekuo vfLrRo dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, budk iquthZfor gksuk vko';d gSA ^^;g iz;kl dsoy ,d o`{k ds jksi.k dk iz'u u gksdj cfYd ,d fopkj ds vadqj.k dk gSA^^ ;g funsZ'k vkosnd ds }kjk Lor% O;Dr dh xbZ lkeqnkf;d lsok dh bPNk ds dkj.k fn;k x;k gS tks LoSfPNd gSA It is expected from appellant No.2 that he shall submit photographs by downloading the mobile application (App) prepared at the instance of High Court for monitoring the plantation through satellite/Geo- Tagging.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next