Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.95 seconds)

Upl Limited vs Registrar & Anr. on 22 February, 2024

This differs from the case of Niranjan Chatterjee (supra), wherein the High Court of Calcutta did, in fact, hold that the stayed decision would continue to have precedential value. However, the factual backdrop of the said decision differs significantly from the present case, as the stay directed by the Supreme Court therein attached specific conditions for maintenance of status quo as well as other directions, which ultimately guided the Court's understanding of the effect such a stay would have.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

The State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Sri Rajendra Nath Khanra on 19 August, 2016

Further, in view of the above discussions we do not find substance in the submissions made by Mr. Rabilal Moitra, learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent, that the writ petitioner was in possession of the land in question and for that reason he was entitled to submit his option in B-Form under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953, for retention of his share of land on the basis of the decree of declaration under reference in the light of the decisions of Gour Gopal Mitra & Anr. vs. State of West Bengal, reported in 67 CWN 12, Niranjan Chatterjee & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., reported in 2007 (3) CHN 683, Mohammad Ali vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors., reported in (2012) 3 WBLR (Cal) 590, Prabhangshu Sekhar Maity vs. State of West Bengal, reported in 2012 (4) CHN (CAL) 167 and Lakshmi Narayan Roy & Ors. vs. Land Reforms Officer & Ors., reported in 80 CWN 42, so long as the order of vesting of portion of the land in question was in existence and without taking any steps in accordance with law before the competent authority in connection with the order of vesting.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - D K Gupta - Full Document
1