Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.76 seconds)

Dhandu @ Kanhiay vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 August, 2018

The facts of the cases Alakh Ram Vs. State of U.P. , Sunil Gujar Vs. State of M.P, Makhanlal Vs. State of M.P. and Kadorilal Raghuvanshi Vs. State of M.P (supra) do not match with the present case as in first case only 17 plants of ganja were seized and there was no satisfactory evidence either oral or documentary to show that the accused has a right over the property from which the Ganja plants were recovered, while in this case in the Patwari report and other documents it is mentioned that the field from which ganja plants were recovered was in the possession of the applicant.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1