The facts of the cases Alakh Ram Vs. State of U.P. , Sunil Gujar
Vs. State of M.P, Makhanlal Vs. State of M.P. and Kadorilal
Raghuvanshi Vs. State of M.P (supra) do not match with the present
case as in first case only 17 plants of ganja were seized and there was
no satisfactory evidence either oral or documentary to show that the
accused has a right over the property from which the Ganja plants
were recovered, while in this case in the Patwari report and other
documents it is mentioned that the field from which ganja plants were
recovered was in the possession of the applicant.