Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 110 (0.95 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India And Others vs S.L. Dutta And Others on 16 November, 1990

Rajendra Singh Kadyan (Lt. General) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 December, 1998

The Court in Union of India & Others Vs. S.L. Dutta and Another's case (supra) did not interfere with the change of policy as there was merely a chance, of promotion of Air Vice Marshal in the Navigation Stream, to be affected by the change of said policy. As far as post of Air Marshal opened to the Air Vice Marshal in the said Stream was concerned, their right or eligibility to be considered for promotion still remained and hence Court held that there was no change in their conditions of service. Another contention was raised by the respondent that if at all the petitioner has suffered then compensation would vindicate his stand and in this connection has cited Lt. Coal.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Indian Airlines Officers Association vs Indian Airlines Ltd. & Ors on 30 July, 2007

"However, it is possible that by reason of such a merger, the chance of promotion of some of the employees may be adversely affected, or some others may benefit in consequence. But this cannot be a ground for setting aside the merger which is essentially a policy decision. This Court in Union of India v. S.L. Dutta examined this contention. In SL Dutta a change in the promotional policy was challenged on the ground that as a result, service conditions of the respondent were adversely affected since his chances of promotion were reduced.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 33 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document

B. Jumrani vs National Buildings Construction ... on 26 July, 1999

34. The next submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner is that she has been put to a disadvantage because of the widening of the channel of promotion to the post of AO. This submission deserves to be rejected. We are in agreement with the learned counsel for the Respondents that a change in the chances of promotion does not amount to a change in the conditions of service. (See Union of India & Ors. Vs. S.L. Dutta & Anr. ). As such, the Petitioner cannot claim to be adversely effected.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - M B Lokur - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next