Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)

Ramesh Chand vs State Of Punjab And Others on 31 August, 2010

This Court on 19.8.2010 in CR No. 1010 of 2010 titled as Gurdev Singh and others vs. Major Singh and others has taken the view that application for condonation of delay is an application on which, the parties should not be called to lead evidence. Such applications should be decided on the basis of affidavits alone. The framing of the issues and leading of evidence is not warranted at this stage to consider whether the delay in filing of the issues is condoned or not. It was held to the following effect: -
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - H Gupta - Full Document

Major Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 20 December, 2010

This Court in Gurdev Singh and others Vs. Major Singh and others, Civil Revision No. 1010 of 2010, decided on 19.08.2010, has examined the question, whether the application for condonation of delay should be decided on the basis of affidavits or the parties should be directed to lead evidence. It was held that application for condonation of delay should be decided on the basis of affidavits alone. It was held to the following effect:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - H Gupta - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs Bir Singh And Another on 9 December, 2010

Firstly the approach of the learned First Appellate Court to give opportunity to parties to lead evidence in an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not appreciable. The question, whether such application should be decided on the basis of affidavits or the parties should be given opportunity to lead evidence, has been examined by this Court in detail in Gurdev Singh and others Vs. Major Singh and others, Civil Revision No. 1010 of 2010, wherein it has been held that such applications are required to be decided on the basis of affidavits alone. It was held to the following effect:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - H Gupta - Full Document
1