Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)

Sidramappa Basappa Atnure vs Bipinchand Fulchand Gandhi on 5 September, 1975

22. The next authority placed before me by Mr. Pinge was a judgment of the Gujarat High Court in Heirs of Jatashanker v. Heirs of Mavji to show firstly that when there were two documents executed on the same date it was open to the Court to hold on the facts and circumstances that the two documents constituted a single transaction and secondly that when the question was as to what was the true nature of the transaction then the same would have to be found out by looking at the contents of the document, the surrounding circumstances and by resorting even to the oral evidence of the parties.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Board Of Trustees Of vs Chennai Container Terminal Private Ltd on 8 January, 2014

47. A Division Bench of Gujarat High Court pointed out in Heirs of late Jatashanker Fulchand Mehta v. Heirs of Late Mavji Trikarn (AIR 1969 Gujarat 169) the fine distinction between an attempt to prove that the transaction itself was different from the one indicated in writing and an attempt to prove that the terms of the transaction were different from the one inferred from the language.
1