Yerram Venkata Subba Reddy, Hyd vs Cvbi, Spe, Hyd on 7 March, 2024
34. It is further contended that learned senior counsel for the
petitioner that no allegation or material indicating that petitioner
conspired with anyone to commit the offence under Section 9 of the
P.C.Act. Reliance is placed on Vijayan v. State of Kerala 23, Laloo
vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 24, Topanda vs. State of Bombay 25 and
Fakhruddin vs. State of Madhya Pradesh 26. The said contention of
learned senior counsel is contrary to record. The Investigating Officer
has recorded the statements of 48 witnesses and collected 46
documents and L.Ws.6, 7, 9, 14, 17 and 35 specifically stated the role
played by the petitioner/A.6, Therefore, the petitioner has to face trial
and prove his innocence. He cannot seek for quashment of
proceedings in C.C.No.26 of 2014.