Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (1.80 seconds)
Documents citing Mukund Lal & Anr vs Union Of India & Anr on 14 October, 1988

Manoj vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 May, 2022

174. In Manu Sharma, in the context of policy diaries, this court noted that “the purpose and the object seems to be quite clear that there should be fairness in investigation, transparency and a record should be maintained to ensure a proper investigation”. This object is rendered entirely meaningless if the police fail to maintain the police diary accurately. Failure to meticulously note down the steps taken during investigation, and the resulting lack of transparency, 78 Mukund Lal v. Union of India 1989 Supp (1) SCC 622, Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab (1991) 4 SCC 341.
Supreme Court of India Cites 140 - Cited by 119 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Mistry Jaswantbhai Manilal vs State Of Gujarat on 3 July, 2023

In case of Mukund Lal v. The State & Anr. 1979 CriLJ 105, the Delhi High Court held that normally in criminal case, the Appellate Court has no power to remand to the Trial Court, except for the purpose of retrial. In the said case, the learned Sessions Judge had remanded the case to the lower Court to afford an opportunity of hearing on question of sentence in terms of Section 235(2) of the Cr.P.C. and it was held that such remand is irregular.
Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - G Gopi - Full Document

Shri Indrajeet Roy vs Republic Of India on 16 September, 1998

In the case of Mukund Lal v. Union of India and Anr., AIR 1989 SC 144 argued that as per the observation made by the apex Court accused has no access to the case diary save and except to the statement as provided in the statute. In that case constitutional validity of the provision in Section 172(3), Cr.P.C. was called in question and it was held that as the accused has no right of access to the case diary. The ratio has no direct application to the point at issue.
Orissa High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 3 - P K Tripathy - Full Document

(Shri) Bhagwan Singh And Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 13 May, 1993

In the case of Mukund Lal v. Union of India and Anr. , their Lordships have held at page 146 in ...The Legislature has reposed complete trust in the Court which is conducting the inquiry or the trial. It had empowered the Court to call for any such relevant case diary, If there is any inconsistency or contradiction arising in the context of the case diary the Court can use the entries for the purpose of contradicting the Police Officer as provided in Sub-section (3) of Section 172 of the Cr. P.C. Ultimately there can be no better custodian or guardian of the interest of justice than the court trying the case. No court will deny to itself the power to make use of the entries in the diary to the advantage of the accused by contradicting the police officer with reference to the contents of the diaries. In view of this safeguard, the charge of unreasonableness, or arbitrariness cannot stand scrutiny. The petitioners claim an unfettered right to make roving inspection of the entries in the case diary regardless of whether these entries are used by the police officer concerned to refresh his memory or regardless of the fact whether the Court has used these entries for purpose of contradicting such police officer. It cannot be said that unless such unfettered right is conferred and recognised, the embargo engrafted in Sub-section (3) of Section 172 of the Cr. P. C. would fail to meet the test of reasonableness. For instance in the case diary there might be a note as regards the identity of the informant who gave some information which resulted h investigation into a particular aspect.
Patna High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 63 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next