citedby: 69746016

M/S Kumar Rice Mill Pvt. Ltd. Thru' ... vs State Of U.P. Thru' Principal ... on 25 November, 2013

16. Before parting the matter we may quote with benefit the conclusions drawn in S/s Gaya Deen Kailash Chand vs. State of UP & others (supra) as follows:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Commercial Motors Ltd. Thr. M.D. ... vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax Lucknow And 2 ... on 3 March, 2014

36. The division bench of this Court in Gaya Deen Kailash Chand Vs. State of U.P. and Others, (2013) 59 VST 144 (All) in para 21 held as under;

Allahabad High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Ram Krishna Verma @ Ram Kishun Verma vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 July, 2019

It is contended by Sri J.L. Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is entitled for benefit of the service rendered by him while working on the post of Tube Well Operator before calculating the final pension of the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner relied upon a judgement of co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Writ A No.46080 of 2012 (Gaya Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others).

Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - P Padia - Full Document

Ram Dular And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 August, 2019

It is contended by Sri J.L. Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are entitled for benefit of the service rendered by them while working on the post of Tubewell Operator before calculating the final pension of the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners relied upon a judgement of co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Writ A No.46080 of 2012 (Gaya Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others).

Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - A K Mishra - Full Document

Ram Prasad Kushwaha And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 25 February, 2020

It is contended by Sri J.L. Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are entitled for benefit of the service rendered by them while working on the post of Tubewell Operator before calculating the final pension of the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners relied upon a judgement of co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Writ A No.46080 of 2012 (Gaya Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others).

Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Aftab Ahamad And Another vs State Of U P And 3 Others on 4 March, 2020

It is contended by Sri J.L. Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are entitled for benefit of the service rendered by them while working on the post of Supervisor Tractor Custom Scheme and Incharge Sales Centre before calculating the final pension of the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners relied upon a judgement of co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Writ A No.46080 of 2012 (Gaya Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others).