Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

M.Ilancheran vs The Chief Secretary on 15 December, 2021

In fact, in a decision of this Court dated 8.12.2009, in W.P.No.3779 of 2008 in the case of “T.Sivagnanansambandan Vs. The Chief Secretary”, wherein a similar circumstance came up for consideration before this Court and this Court, by taking note of earlier decision in “M.A.Mohammed Ibrahim Vs. Secretary to Government” reported in 2009(3) CTC 490, by referring to the amended provisions of the Notaries Rules, 1956, observed that the Government is empowered to relax the conditions and such power must be liberally exercised. In the said case, there was a delay of nearly 6 years and following the earlier https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/7 W.P.No.18419 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.21744 & 31572 of 2018 decision and interpreting Rule 8(B) of the Notaries Rules this Court directed the Government to re-consider the matter.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - K Ramasamy - Full Document

C.Jeya Indra Patel vs The Chief Secretary To on 24 July, 2014

10. The learned counsel placed reliance on the decision of this Court in W.P.No.3779 of 2008 in th e case of T.Sivagnanansambandan Vs. The Chief Secretary dated 08.12.2009 wherein a similar circumstance came up for consideration before this Court and this Court, by taking note of earlier decision in M.A.Mohammed Ibrahim Vs. Secretary to Government reported in 2009(3) CTC 490, by referring to the amended provisions of the Notaries Rules, observed that the Government is empowered to relax the conditions and such power must be liberally exercised. In the said case, there was a delay of nearly 6 years and following the earlier decision and interpreting Rule 8(B) of the Notaries Rules this Court directed the Government to re-consider the matter.
1