Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.36 seconds)

Arun Nath Shahdeo And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 19 December, 1991

I am accordingly of the view that for applying Section 4(9) it is not necessary at all that there should be two distinct pieces of land. Section 4(9) will apply even in case of one plot on a portion of which there is a building with dwelling unit and its land appurtenant while remaining portion is vacant. If there is one plot on which there is a building with dwelling unit therein, in that case the built up area would be 1000 sq. mtrs. as the land appurtenant under Section 2(q) will first be excluded. If some surplus land remains then Section 4(9) will be attracted and built up area and the land appurtenant will be taken into account to determine whether the person holds vacant land beyond the ceiling limit or not. In this way the provisions of Section 2(q) (i), (ii), (iii) and Section 4(9) of the Act have to be interpreted.
Patna High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 1 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Anil Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 May, 2022

The only prayer made by the applicant is that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Vth, Allahabad be directed to decide the application under Section 239 Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for the discharge in case no. 3111 of 2009, State v. Prem Singh And Another, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC, police station Jhunsi, District Allahabad within a stipulated period.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R B Singh - Full Document

Prem Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 April, 2025

3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the proceeding of Case no.1840/2024 (State v/s Prem Singh & Another) arising out of case crime no.552/2023, under sections 420, 342, 504, 506, 452, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Sikandra, District Agra along with Cognizance/Summoning order dated 02.02.2024 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in terms of Compromise dated 13.08.2024 between parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D Verma - Full Document

Prem Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 August, 2022

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 26.10.2021 and cognizance order dated 22.02.2022 as well as the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 96 of 2022 (State Vs. Prem Singh & another), arising out of Case Crime No. 0332 of 2021, under Sections- 354B, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station- Sahawar, District- Kasganj, pending in the court of learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Kasganj.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1