Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.49 seconds)
Documents citing Sri Inja Venkatrao vs Smt. Sundara Barik And Anr. on 21 August, 1990

Bhuribai And Anr. vs Shyam Sunder And Ors. on 5 July, 2006

Learned single Judge considered two decisions while recording the finding, one in the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Punjab Government and second in the case of Inja Venkatrao v. Sundara Barik and has also considered the Division Bench decision of Allahabad High Court in case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shibhu Bai , but facts of this case are distinguishable. In this case accident took place due to electric wire as the bus was standing just below the electric wire.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Divisional Manager, New India ... vs Sanjukta Mallik And Ors. on 19 June, 2000

The ratio of the decisions in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Punjab Government, 1990 ACJ 415 (P&H) and Inja Venkatrao v. Sundara Barik 1991 ACJ 581 (Orissa), is still applicable to cases arising under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The addition of Sub-section (2) of Section 123 does not provide any additional defence to the insurance company. The provision is aimed at protecting the passengers and not the insurance company.
Orissa High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - P K Misra - Full Document

K. Nandakumar vs Managing Director, Thanthai Periyar ... on 20 September, 1991

10. However, the learned counsel for the appellant sought to cite several decisions of different High Courts, wherein, according to him, even where there is negligence on the part of the deceased victim in the case of fatal accidents or on the part of the injured claimant in other accidents compensation has been awarded under Section 92-A of the Act. The decisions cited by him are: Inja Venkatrao v. Sundara Barik 1991 ACJ 581 (Orissa); Vatschala Uttam More v. Shivaji Dnyanu Patil 1990 ACJ 1001 (Bombay); Krishna Pillai v. Jalal Ahamed 1989 ACJ 991 (Kerala); Manne Bala Saraswathi v. Pilchale Subbarao 1990 ACJ 518 (AP) and K.P. All v. M. Madhavan 1990 ACJ 373 (Kerala).
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 50 - K Venkataswami - Full Document

K. Nandakumar vs The Managing Director, Thanthai ... on 20 September, 1991

10. However, the learned Counsel for the appellant sought to cite several decisions of different High Courts, wherein, according to him, even where there is negligence on the part of the deceased victim in the case of fatal accidents or on the part of the injured claimant in other accidents compensation has been awarded under Section 92-A of the Act. The decisions cited by him are Inja Venkatrao v. Sundara Barik , Vatchala Uttam Mors v. Shivaji Dnyanu Patil A.I.R. 1991 Bom.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Salma & Ors on 26 July, 2016

From the said statement of the bus conductor, it is apparent that the deceased was permitted by the conductor to travel on the roof top and, therefore, it cannot be denied that the deceased was a passenger in the said bus and, therefore, in those circumstances the appellant - Insurance Company cannot shirk from its liability as held by Orissa High Court in the case of Inja Venkatrao (supra).
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - A Bhansali - Full Document

Sundarbai And Anr. vs Laxminarayan And Ors. on 14 September, 2005

6. Further reliance was placed by the learned Counsel for the appellant on a decision in the matter of Inja Venkatrao v. Sundara Barik , wherein in a case of death of a person who was travelling on the roof of the bus, insurance company was held liable for payment of compensation holding that person travelling as passenger on the roof of the bus comes within the meaning of passenger in the bus.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - N K Mody - Full Document
1