Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.74 seconds)
Documents citing Nat Organic Chemicals Industries vs B.L. Industries on 14 January, 1988

Niky Tasha (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Regional P.F. Commissioner And Ors. on 11 May, 1994

"Here, we find that it is not a case of total omission to make the contributions. There had been only delayed contributions. The periods are different and the days of delay are also different. A glance at the statement of damages, annexed to the impugned proceedings, shows that the days of delay range from a minimum of 7 days to a maximum of 47 days, but, a flat rat of 25% has been adopted by the 1st respondent; and certainly, we cannot commend the impugned proceedings on the ground that the application of the norms, as set down by the pronouncement of the Supreme Court, referred to above, has been done. This only exposes lack of application of mind on the part of the 1 st respondent."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ssa International Limited vs Paras Sales Corporation And Ors. on 21 September, 2004

In support of her contention that the ad-interim injunction is not liable to be vacated for the alleged non-compliance of the provisions of Order 39 Rule 3 CPC, she has relied upon decisions of this Court in the case of Exide Industries Ltd. Vs. Exide Corporatioin, USA and Ors., and an earlier judgment in the case of Nat Organic Chemicals Industries Vs. B.L. Industries, wherein the Court has taken a view that it is not in all cases of non-compliance of the provisions of Order 39 Rule 3 CPC that an ex-parte order should be vacated but before doing so, the defendant must show that it has caused a serious prejudice to him.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - R C Jain - Full Document
1