Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 812 (2.79 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Punjab & Ors vs Amar Nath Goyal & Ors on 11 August, 2005

Dr. Surendra Narayan Gupta vs Principal Secretary State Of M.P. And 2 ... on 1 July, 2024

Although, in the case of N. Subbarayudu and others (supra) the Supreme Court has held that the decision rendered in the case of D. S. Nakara and others (supra) has already been considerably watered down in the subsequent decision in the case of Amar Nath Goyal (supra), but this court finds that so far as the case of Amar Nath Goyal is concerned, this judgement has also been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of All Manipur Pensioners Association (supra) in para 7.9. In such circumstances, the aforesaid decision would also not be of any avail to the respondents.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

All India S-30 Pensioners Association vs Union Of India on 20 November, 2014

5. In a catena of decisions of this Court it has been held that the cut off date is fixed by the executive authority keeping in view the economic conditions, financial constraints and many other administrative and other attending circumstances. This Court is also of the view that fixing cut off dates is within the domain of the executive authority and the Court should not normally interfere with the fixation of cut off date by the executive authority unless such order appears to be on the face of it blatantly discriminatory and arbitrary (see State of Punjab & Ors. v. Amar Nath Goyal & Ors., (2005) 6 SCC 754 :[2006 (1) SLR 145 (SC)].
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 24 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Shri Virendra Kr. Nagar vs Ministry Of Finance on 1 July, 2024

Although, in the case of N. Subbarayudu and others (supra) the Supreme Court has held that the decision rendered in the case of D. S. Nakara and others (supra) has already been considerably watered down in the subsequent decision in the case of Amar Nath Goyal (supra), but this court finds that so far as the case of Amar Nath Goyal is concerned, this judgement has also been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of All Manipur Pensioners Association (supra) in para 7.9. In such circumstances, the aforesaid decision would also not be of any avail to the respondents.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Govind Prasad Sharma vs State Of M.P. Through Ministry Of ... on 1 July, 2024

Although, in the case of N. Subbarayudu and others (supra) the Supreme Court has held that the decision rendered in the case of D. S. Nakara and others (supra) has already been considerably watered down in the subsequent decision in the case of Amar Nath Goyal (supra), but this court finds that so far as the case of Amar Nath Goyal is concerned, this judgement has also been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of All Manipur Pensioners Association (supra) in para 7.9. In such circumstances, the aforesaid decision would also not be of any avail to the respondents.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Shashikant Ghatpande vs State Of M.P. on 1 July, 2024

Although, in the case of N. Subbarayudu and others (supra) the Supreme Court has held that the decision rendered in the case of D. S. Nakara and others (supra) has already been considerably watered down in the subsequent decision in the case of Amar Nath Goyal (supra), but this court finds that so far as the case of Amar Nath Goyal is concerned, this judgement has also been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of All Manipur Pensioners Association (supra) in para 7.9. In such circumstances, the aforesaid decision would also not be of any avail to the respondents.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Shri Mahendra Kumar Lalan vs Ministry Of Finance Department on 1 July, 2024

Although, in the case of N. Subbarayudu and others (supra) the Supreme Court has held that the decision rendered in the case of D. S. Nakara and others (supra) has already been considerably watered down in the subsequent decision in the case of Amar Nath Goyal (supra), but this court finds that so far as the case of Amar Nath Goyal is concerned, this judgement has also been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of All Manipur Pensioners Association (supra) in para 7.9. In such circumstances, the aforesaid decision would also not be of any avail to the respondents.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Geeta Maheshwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 July, 2024

Although, in the case of N. Subbarayudu and others (supra) the Supreme Court has held that the decision rendered in the case of D. S. Nakara and others (supra) has already been considerably watered down in the subsequent decision in the case of Amar Nath Goyal (supra), but this court finds that so far as the case of Amar Nath Goyal is concerned, this judgement has also been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of All Manipur Pensioners Association (supra) in para 7.9. In such circumstances, the aforesaid decision would also not be of any avail to the respondents.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next