Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.87 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Haro Singh vs Shri Ajay Kumar Chawla And Ors. on 14 January, 2004

The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(1) , ... on 4 June, 2024

In the case of Haro Singh vs. Ajay Kumar Chawla (supra), request for condonation of delay was rejected and it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court; referring to Babu Ram vs. Devinder ITA Nos.699 to 704/Bang/2024 The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists Association, Bangalore Page 16 of 23 Mohan Kaura AIR 1981 Delhi 14, Kankala Gurunath Patro vs. D. Dhanu Patro AIR 1984 Ori 173, and Jagannath Prasad vs. Sant Hardasram Sevashaam AIR 1978 All 250; as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Boutique Hotels India (P) Ltd., New ... vs Acit, New Delhi on 31 October, 2019

In the case of Haro Singh vs. Ajay Kumar Chawla (supra), request for condonation of delay was rejected and it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court; referring to Babu Ram vs. Devinder Mohan Kaura AIR 1981 Delhi 14, Kankala Gurunath Patro vs. D. Dhanu Patro AIR 1984 Ori 173, and Jagannath Prasad vs. Sant Hardasram Sevashaam AIR 1978 All 250; as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3)(1), ... on 4 June, 2024

In the case of Haro Singh vs. Ajay Kumar Chawla (supra), request for condonation of delay was rejected and it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court; referring to Babu Ram vs. Devinder ITA Nos.699 to 704/Bang/2024 The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists Association, Bangalore Page 16 of 23 Mohan Kaura AIR 1981 Delhi 14, Kankala Gurunath Patro vs. D. Dhanu Patro AIR 1984 Ori 173, and Jagannath Prasad vs. Sant Hardasram Sevashaam AIR 1978 All 250; as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(1), ... on 4 June, 2024

In the case of Haro Singh vs. Ajay Kumar Chawla (supra), request for condonation of delay was rejected and it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court; referring to Babu Ram vs. Devinder ITA Nos.699 to 704/Bang/2024 The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists Association, Bangalore Page 16 of 23 Mohan Kaura AIR 1981 Delhi 14, Kankala Gurunath Patro vs. D. Dhanu Patro AIR 1984 Ori 173, and Jagannath Prasad vs. Sant Hardasram Sevashaam AIR 1978 All 250; as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3)(2), ... on 4 June, 2024

In the case of Haro Singh vs. Ajay Kumar Chawla (supra), request for condonation of delay was rejected and it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court; referring to Babu Ram vs. Devinder ITA Nos.699 to 704/Bang/2024 The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists Association, Bangalore Page 16 of 23 Mohan Kaura AIR 1981 Delhi 14, Kankala Gurunath Patro vs. D. Dhanu Patro AIR 1984 Ori 173, and Jagannath Prasad vs. Sant Hardasram Sevashaam AIR 1978 All 250; as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(1), ... on 4 June, 2024

In the case of Haro Singh vs. Ajay Kumar Chawla (supra), request for condonation of delay was rejected and it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court; referring to Babu Ram vs. Devinder ITA Nos.699 to 704/Bang/2024 The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists Association, Bangalore Page 16 of 23 Mohan Kaura AIR 1981 Delhi 14, Kankala Gurunath Patro vs. D. Dhanu Patro AIR 1984 Ori 173, and Jagannath Prasad vs. Sant Hardasram Sevashaam AIR 1978 All 250; as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3)(2) , ... on 4 June, 2024

In the case of Haro Singh vs. Ajay Kumar Chawla (supra), request for condonation of delay was rejected and it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court; referring to Babu Ram vs. Devinder ITA Nos.699 to 704/Bang/2024 The Karnataka Chemists & Druggists Association, Bangalore Page 16 of 23 Mohan Kaura AIR 1981 Delhi 14, Kankala Gurunath Patro vs. D. Dhanu Patro AIR 1984 Ori 173, and Jagannath Prasad vs. Sant Hardasram Sevashaam AIR 1978 All 250; as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P.B. Patel & Co.,, Ankleshwar vs Assessee on 13 April, 2007

5. On the other hand, the learned DR submitted that the learned Counsel for the assessee admitted the addition before the learned CIT(A) because of the details reflected in the TDS certificate which exceeded the amount declared in the return of income. The learned DR submitted that even in the reply to the show cause for enhancement in respect of the total receipt, the assessee's Counsel did not submit any explanation and accepted the claim of the AO that the addition is to be made further. The learned DR, therefore, submitted that there is no question of giving wrong advice by the counsel who was appearing for the assessee. The learned DR relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Haro Singh Vs Ajay Kumar Chawla & Ors in CR NO.810/2001 dated 14-12-2004 in which the Hon'ble High Court ITA No.2557/Ahd/2008 5 M/s. P. B. Patel & Co. VS ITO, W-4, Bharuch considering its earlier decision held that "the counsel must disclose the circumstances in which incorrect advice was given and it is not sufficient to make a perfunctory and general statement that the wrong advice was given bona fide". The learned DR submitted that since in that case no sufficient cause for delay has been shown and no complaint was filed against the advocate who purportedly gave wrong advice. Therefore, the petitioner of the petition was dismissed being time barred. The learned DR therefore, submitted that it is not a case of wrong advice, therefore, delay should not be condoned in the matter and that there is no merit in the appeal of the assessee. Therefore, the delay should not be condoned and the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed being time barred.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next