citedby: 70725834

1 - 10 of 507 (1.04 seconds)

Documents citing State Of Rajasthan And Anr vs Surendra Mohnot And Ors on 30 June, 2014

State Of Raj And Ors vs Smt Sanotsh Dhinwa on 3 July, 2017

In our considered opinion, the Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Gopa Ram in DB Civil Special Appeal No.44/2016, decided on 18.04.2016 had no right to distinguish the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Jagdish Narayan Chaturvedi (Supra) and State of Rajasthan vs. Surendra Mohnot & Ors.

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Sagar And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 12 January, 2021

Accordingly, the charge sheet dated 28.04.2019 and cognizance/summoning order dated 16.11.2019 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 2836/9 of 2019 (State vs. Surendra and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 440 of 2018, under Sections 498A, 323, 315, 354A, 506, 376/511, 201, 120B IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Thana Bhawan, District-Shamli, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shamli, are hereby quashed.

Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Inder Singh Saini vs State Of Raj And Ors (2026:Rj-Jp:7855) on 19 February, 2026

10. The judgments cited by the petitioner's counsel are rendered irrelevant by the legal principles established in State of Rajasthan Vs. Surendra Mohnot (supra).

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... vs Shri. Vijay Tukaram Paste And Anr on 28 April, 2016

Therefore, for the same reasons as aforesaid, the decision in Surendra Mohnot (supra) is also distinguishable.

Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 7 - M S Sonak - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr vs Shri Anil Shantaram Deorukhakar And Ors on 28 April, 2016

Therefore, for the same reasons as aforesaid, the decision in Surendra Mohnot (supra) is also distinguishable.

Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 17 - M S Sonak - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... vs Smt. Sneha Sunil Shiwanekar on 28 April, 2016

Therefore, for the same reasons as aforesaid, the decision in Surendra Mohnot (supra) is also distinguishable.

Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Shri Sopan Bhikaji Gargote, Ldc And Anr on 28 April, 2016

Therefore, for the same reasons as aforesaid, the decision in Surendra Mohnot (supra) is also distinguishable.

Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... vs Mr. Akaram Pandurang Patil And Ors on 28 April, 2016

Therefore, for the same reasons as aforesaid, the decision in Surendra Mohnot (supra) is also distinguishable.

Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - M S Sonak - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... vs Mr. Suresh G. Mulik And Ors on 28 April, 2016

Therefore, for the same reasons as aforesaid, the decision in Surendra Mohnot (supra) is also distinguishable.

Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - M S Sonak - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra, Thrrough ... vs Smt. Pranita Prakash Sarang And Ors on 28 April, 2016

Therefore, for the same reasons as aforesaid, the decision in Surendra Mohnot (supra) is also distinguishable.

Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next