Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 99 (0.97 seconds)
Documents citing Suresh Kalmadi vs Cbi on 19 January, 2012

Maninder Sharma vs State Tax Officer on 31 August, 2022

" 9. The aforesaid decision has also been quoted and accepted by the Supreme Court in case of 'Dipak Shubashchandra Mehta Vs. C.B.I. and Anr.' 2012(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 870 and by this Court in 'Giri Raj Vs. State of Haryana' 2019(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 530 and 'Anil Kumar Vs. State of Punjab' 2013(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 854 as also by the Delhi High Court in 'Suresh Kalmadi Vs. CBI' 2012(5) R.C.R. (Criminal) 556, in which it was observed -
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 74 - Cited by 1 - J S Bedi - Full Document

Surinder Pal Singh vs State Of Punjab on 30 September, 2020

9. The aforesaid decision has also been quoted and accepted by the Supreme Court in case of 'Dipak Shubashchandra Mehta Vs. C.B.I. and Anr.' 2012(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 870 and by this Court in 'Giri Raj Vs. State of Haryana' 2019(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 530 and 'Anil Kumar Vs. State of Punjab' 2013(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 854 as also by the Delhi High Court in 'Suresh Kalmadi Vs. CBI' 2012(5) R.C.R. (Criminal) 556, in which it was observed -
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Navdeep Singh Bains vs State Of Punjab on 26 October, 2021

The aforesaid decision has also been quoted and accepted by the Supreme Court in case of 'Dipak Shubashchandra Mehta Vs. C.B.I. and Anr.' 2012(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 870 and by this Court in 'Giri Raj Vs. State of Haryana' 2019(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 530 and 'Anil Kumar Vs. State of Punjab' 2013(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 854 as also by the Delhi High Court in 'Suresh Kalmadi Vs. CBI' 2012(5) R.C.R. (Criminal) 556, in which it was observed -
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - B S Walia - Full Document

Obi Ogochukwu Stephen vs State on 10 January, 2022

"6. On perusal of the aforesaid provision of law, it is clear that whenever any Court or any officer in charge of a Police Station considers that the production of any document or other thing is necessary or desirable for the purposes of any investigation, inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code by or before such Court or officer, such Court may issue summons, or such officer a written order, to the person in whose possession or power such document or thing is believed to be, requiring hint to attend and produce it, or to produce it, at the time and place stated in the summons or order.", and the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Suresh Kalmadi Vs. CBI" 2015 {3} JCC 1874 with specific observations in paragraph 24 thereof to the effect:-
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A Malhotra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next