Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.86 seconds)

Union Of India & Anr. vs Alcon Builders And Engineer Pvt. Ltd. on 17 January, 2023

(emphasis supplied) 20.5. To be sure, it is also necessary for this court to point-out that the apparently contrary view taken by a Division Bench of this court in MBL Infrastructures Ltd. vs. 11 Telecommunication Consultants of India , is distinguishable on facts, inasmuch as while holding that an arbitral award can only be set-aside as a whole, the court was dealing with a case where the learned single Judge had proceeded to correct errors and thereby modify the arbitral award, which the Division Bench held was beyond the scope of the powers of the court under section 34 of the A&C Act. In that case, the Division Bench found fault with the learned single Judge having modified and corrected the amounts awarded under individual heads of claims and counter- claims, which, there is no dispute, the court cannot do in exercise of powers under section 34. However, the Division Bench was not seized of and did not express any opinion on the question of what the correct course of action would be if one or more claims in their entirety are set-aside - but not 11 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4613 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed OMP 146/2008 Page 18 of 24 By:NEERAJ Signing Date:17.01.2023 11:30:14 2023/DHC/000304 modified - by the court in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 34 of the A&C Act.

National Highways Authority Of India vs Trichy Thanjavur Expressway Ltd. on 21 August, 2023

60. While closing the chapter on the power of a Court to set aside an award in part, the Court deems it apposite to deal with a decision rendered by a Division Bench of our Court in MBL Infrastructures Ltd. v. Telecommunication Consultants of India26. In MBL the Division Bench had while considering an appeal preferred under Section 37 of the Act made the following pertinent observations: -
Delhi High Court Cites 141 - Cited by 1 - Y Varma - Full Document
1