Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.25 seconds)

Graphisads Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs Department Of Income Tax

In coming to this conclusion, I rely on the pronouncement in the case of CIT Vs. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd. (313 ITR 340), Sahibag Entrepreneure Vs. ITO (50 ITD 113) (Ahd), CIT Vs. Shoorj Vallbdas and Co. (46 ITR 144)(SC) and Highway Constructions (Co.)(P) Ltd. Vs. CIT (199 ITR 702) (Guwahati), wherein it has been held that in the absence of nexus no proportionate disallowance of interest expenses is warranted.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. ... vs Department Of Income Tax on 16 March, 2010

For that purpose, reliance has been placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Aravalli Construction Company Ltd vs CIT, 259 ITR 30, wherein it has been held that the expenditure of software will constitute capital expenditure only and that even if they are standardized and not specifically custom made will not alter the situation.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Yojaka ( India) Pvt Ltd vs The Asst. Commissioner Income Tax on 1 December, 2022

5. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, without expressing any opinion on the mertis/demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this petition directing the petitioner to submit a comprehensive 4 representation ventilating all its grievances to the respondents within two weeks. If the petitioner submits one more representation along with relevant documents, the respondents shall address the grievances of the petitioner and consider and pass appropriate orders/take appropriate decision bearing in mind the judgment of this Court dated 01.04.2022 passed in W.P.No.14615/2021 (M/s. Yojaka (India) Pvt Ltd.) Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) as well as the representations dated 02.05.2022 and 07.07.2022 at Annexures-J and K, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S R Kumar - Full Document
1