citedby: 711964

1 - 5 of 5 (1.35 seconds)

Documents citing Bidhumukhi Dasi vs Jitendra Nath Roy And Ors. on 31 August, 1909

Smt. Sunanda Chowdhury & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 5 December, 2018

Bidhumukhi Dasi (supra) has held that, possession of an immovable property follows the title to the property. In the facts of the present case, both title and possession to the property are in dispute in a pending civil suit.

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

25 vs K.M. Munireddy (Supra) on 15 September, 1995

Allahabad High Court Cites 170 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

5 vs Walford 5 on 13 July, 1859

101. Bidhumukhi Dasi Vs. Jitendra Nath Roy and 1061/1284 others, 1909 Indian Cases (Calcutta) 442;

Allahabad High Court Cites 551 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nanji Koer vs Umatul Batul on 26 June, 1911

The adjudication was by a Court of competent jurisdiction Bidhumukhi v. Jitendra 10 C.L.J. 527 : 4 Ind. Cas. 442.

Calcutta High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Mr. Musharraf Alam Sk. .....For The vs Jitendra on 13 December, 2011

On hearing Mrs. Chatterjee and on perusal of the impugned order, I am reminded of the Bench decision of this Court reported in Vol. X CLJ 527 (Bidhumukhi Dasi V. Jitendra Nath Roy and Others) wherein the luminous dictum of Mr. Justice Maule in Jones V. Chapman (1847-1849 2 Exch. 803; 76 R.R. 794) on the subject of determination of legal possession where physical control is doubtful or interrupted was noted and applied. The passage reads:

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Smt. Sunanda Chowdhury & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 5 December, 2018

25 vs K.M. Munireddy (Supra) on 15 September, 1995

5 vs Walford 5 on 13 July, 1859

Nanji Koer vs Umatul Batul on 26 June, 1911

Mr. Musharraf Alam Sk. .....For The vs Jitendra on 13 December, 2011