Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 6 August, 2003
In other words, we hold that the view as expressed in Rajeevan v. Excise Inspector and Purushan v. State of Kerala is correct.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.59 seconds)Documents citing
Purushan vs State Of Kerala on 18 June, 2002
Dharmapalan vs State Of Kerala on 23 June, 2005
Crl.R.P.No.18 Of 2006
case (supra) and Purushan's case (supra) was that the possession
envisaged in Sec.55(a) of the Act should necessarily be in the course of
import, export transport or transit and thus possession by itself or
possession simplicitor, in the absence of the allegation that such
possession has taken place in the course of import, export, transport or
transit was not a culpable criminal offence as contemplated under
Sec.55(a) of the Act.
1