As Yuvneet Kumar & Others vs . Mcd & Others. on 16 August, 2007
11. So far as the question of equal pay for equal work is
concerned, the workman cannot be equated with his counter
parts who was regular employees as he was daily wager. He
was appointed as daily wager as per his own wishes and he
received the salary as per the minimum wages. The workman
has already been regularized w.e.f. 24.11.1997 under the
policy of the management. So, his claiming of equal pay for
equal work is not justified, in view of the orders, passed by
the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in 2005 LLR P-366 titled
as YUVNEET KUMAR & OTHERS VS. MCD & OTHERS.
Therefore, the workman is not entitled to equal pay for equal
work as claimed in his statement of claim and he is also not
entitled to claim service benefits for the intervening period.