Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 300 (0.68 seconds)
Documents citing Rajendra Prasad Mathur Etc vs Karnataka University & Anr on 1 May, 1986

Madhumita Das vs University Of Calcutta And Ors. on 1 March, 2004

In the case of Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University (supra) by virtue of the interim orders passed by the High Court as well as Apex Court the appellant was permitted to pursue his study notwithstanding his ineligibility. Under such circumstances, the Apex Court exercised power under Article 142 of the Constitution permitting the appellant to continue. Thus, similar benefit cannot be given to the petitioner at the instance of this Court.
Calcutta High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - B Bhattacharya - Full Document

Saumya Shukla vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 28 August, 2024

20. Applying these authorities in the present case, it appears that the petitioners' documents were accepted by the respective centres of Aiims, despite the fact that their qualifying examination results were declared one week later than stipulated in the prospectus. The petitioners have prosecuted their studies for almost two months prior to issuance of the impugned OM dated 18-10-2021. There is no allegation that the petitioners had misrepresented or concealed any information from Aiims indeed, there cannot be, as the qualifying examination was conducted by Aiims itself. Applying the observations of the Supreme Court in Rajendra Prasad Mathur case [Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University, 1986 Supp SCC 740] , in the present case also, the blame lies more upon the institution than the petitioners. The candidates applied; their results were declared by Aiims, New Delhi; those results were submitted to the regional centres to which they have been assigned, and they were granted admission. Their admissions were cancelled after they had spent almost two months on the course.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief/Prin. ... on 17 August, 2023

20. Applying these authorities in the present case, it appears that the petitioners' documents were accepted by the respective centres of Aiims, despite the fact that their qualifying examination results were declared one week later than stipulated in the prospectus. The petitioners have prosecuted their studies for almost two months prior to issuance of the impugned OM dated 18-10-2021. There is no allegation that the petitioners had misrepresented or concealed any information from Aiims indeed, there cannot be, as the qualifying examination was conducted by Aiims itself. Applying the observations of the Supreme Court in Rajendra Prasad Mathur case [Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University, 1986 Supp SCC 740] , in the present case also, the blame lies more upon the institution than the petitioners. The candidates applied; their results were declared by Aiims, New Delhi; those results were submitted to the regional centres to which they have been assigned, and they were granted admission. Their admissions were cancelled after they had spent almost two months on the course.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - R S Chauhan - Full Document

Ranjana Mishra vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/ ... on 28 August, 2024

20. Applying these authorities in the present case, it appears that the petitioners' documents were accepted by the respective centres of Aiims, despite the fact that their qualifying examination results were declared one week later than stipulated in the prospectus. The petitioners have prosecuted their studies for almost two months prior to issuance of the impugned OM dated 18-10-2021. There is no allegation that the petitioners had misrepresented or concealed any information from Aiims indeed, there cannot be, as the qualifying examination was conducted by Aiims itself. Applying the observations of the Supreme Court in Rajendra Prasad Mathur case [Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University, 1986 Supp SCC 740] , in the present case also, the blame lies more upon the institution than the petitioners. The candidates applied; their results were declared by Aiims, New Delhi; those results were submitted to the regional centres to which they have been assigned, and they were granted admission. Their admissions were cancelled after they had spent almost two months on the course.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Pallavi Soni vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher ... on 31 May, 2023

20. Applying these authorities in the present case, it appears that the petitioners' documents were accepted by the respective centres of Aiims, despite the fact that their qualifying examination results were declared one week later than stipulated in the prospectus. The petitioners have prosecuted their studies for almost two months prior to issuance of the impugned OM dated 18-10-2021. There is no allegation that the petitioners had misrepresented or concealed any information from Aiims --indeed, there cannot be, as the qualifying examination was conducted by Aiims itself. Applying the observations of the Supreme Court in Rajendra Prasad Mathur case [Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University, 1986 Supp SCC 740] , in the present case also, the blame lies more upon the institution than the petitioners. The candidates applied; their results were declared by Aiims, New Delhi; those results were submitted to the regional centres to which they have been assigned, and they were granted admission. Their admissions were cancelled after they had spent almost two months on the course.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - V Chaudhary - Full Document

Shalini Diwakar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, ... on 3 September, 2024

20. Applying these authorities in the present case, it appears that the petitioners' documents were accepted by the respective centres of Aiims, despite the fact that their qualifying examination results were declared one week later than stipulated in the prospectus. The petitioners have prosecuted their studies for almost two months prior to issuance of the impugned OM dated 18-10-2021. There is no allegation that the petitioners had misrepresented or concealed any information from Aiims --indeed, there cannot be, as the qualifying examination was conducted by Aiims itself. Applying the observations of the Supreme Court in Rajendra Prasad Mathur case [Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University, 1986 Supp SCC 740] , in the present case also, the blame lies more upon the institution than the petitioners. The candidates applied; their results were declared by Aiims, New Delhi; those results were submitted to the regional centres to which they have been assigned, and they were granted admission. Their admissions were cancelled after they had spent almost two months on the course.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Pratham Patidar S/O Devnarayan Patidar ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 May, 2025

In this connection, we may refer to a decision of this court in Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University, 1986 Supp SCC 740 : AIR 1986 SC 1448. In that case, the appellants were admitted to certain private engineering colleges for the B.E. Degree course, although they were not eligible for admission. In that case, this Court dismissed the appeals preferred by the students whose admissions were subsequently cancelled and the order of cancellation was upheld by the High Court. At the same time, this Court took the view that the fault lay with the engineering colleges which admitted the appellants and that there was no reason why the appellants should suffer for the sins of the management of those engineering colleges Accordingly, this Court allowed the appellants to continue their studies in the respective engineering colleges in which they were granted admission. The same principle which weighed with this Court in the instant case. The appellant was not at fault and we do not see why he should suffer for the mistake committed by the Vice Chancellor and the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering".
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Rigved vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 May, 2025

In this connection, we may refer to a decision of this court in Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University, 1986 Supp SCC 740 : AIR 1986 SC 1448. In that case, the appellants were admitted to certain private engineering colleges for the B.E. Degree course, although they were not eligible for admission. In that case, this Court dismissed the appeals preferred by the students whose admissions were subsequently cancelled and the order of cancellation was upheld by the High Court. At the same time, this Court took the view that the fault lay with the engineering colleges which admitted the appellants and that there was no reason why the appellants should suffer for the sins of the management of those engineering colleges Accordingly, this Court allowed the appellants to continue their studies in the respective engineering colleges in which they were granted admission. The same principle which weighed with this Court in the instant case. The appellant was not at fault and we do not see why he should suffer for the mistake committed by the Vice Chancellor and the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering".
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next