Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 50 (1.14 seconds)
Documents citing Ossein And Gelatine ... vs Modi Alkalies And Chemicals Ltd. & Anr on 10 August, 1989

Riyaz Shah Khan Azam Shah Khan vs State Election Commission And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document

Mussa Noor Mohd Patel vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document

Balasaheb Yogiraj Sanap And Another vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document

Sameer Subhash Rajurkar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 3 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document

Rajendra Laxman Narwade And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document

T.Sudheer vs M.V.Susheela on 9 September, 2009

17. The Apex Court considered the decision in Gullapalli Nageswara Rao's case (supra) in Ossein & Gelatine Manufacturers' Association of India v. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited, (1989) 4 SCC 264. It was a case involving a decision under Section 22 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act. The Modis moved for establishment of an undertaking for manufacture of Ossein and Jelatins in the State of Rajasthan. The Ossein and Jelatine Manufacturers Association of India opposed the application.
Kerala High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 20 - Full Document

Zakat Foundation Of India And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document

Hakim Kadu Patel vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document

Kishor Babulal Tulsibagwale vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 26 May, 2020

50. We lay our hands on the citation in the case of Ossian and Gelatin Manufacturers Association of India Vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Limited and others, reported in (1989) 4 SCC 264, wherein it is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in a case where the order has been passed by an officer, different from the one who heard the parties, after considering all the points, does not amount to prejudice. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that in such a case, the requirement of natural justice can be said to have been complied with. It is not a case of prejudice where the charges were heard by one officer and order was passed by another officer.
Bombay High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next