citedby: 717174

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Documents citing Md. Israil vs Chaudhary Sia Saran Sinha And Anr. on 11 April, 1961

Bahubali vs Collector Of Central Excise And Customs on 17 December, 1983

In Mohamed Israil v. Sia Suran Sinha, AIR 1961 Pat. 411 at p. 412, the Bench has held that though the evidence might not be sufficient for securing conviction in a criminal case, the management had every jurisdiction to deny re-employment in the context of heavy suspicion relating to the charge.

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Tamil Nadu Cites 26 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

I.E.L. Ltd. vs P.O., Labour Court And Ors. on 9 August, 1991

In Md. Israil v. Choudhury Sia Saran Sinha, reported in 1962-I-LLJ-519 at 525, a Division Bench of this Court held that:

Patna High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 4 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Shaik Kasim vs The Superintendent Of Post Offices, ... on 25 November, 1964

(6) We may next examine Mahomed Israil v. Sia Suran Sinha, which concerned the alleged wilful falsifications of accounts by one in the position of an accused; the evidence adduced on behalf of the Management, which dispensed with the services of the petitioner, included certified copies of depositions of witnesses examined in the criminal court. Nevertheless, the Bench held that, though the evidence might not be sufficient for securing conviction in a criminal case, the management had every justification to deny re-employment, in the context of heavy suspicion relating to the charge.

Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 41 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Bahubali vs Collector Of Central Excise And Customs on 17 December, 1983

I.E.L. Ltd. vs P.O., Labour Court And Ors. on 9 August, 1991

Shaik Kasim vs The Superintendent Of Post Offices, ... on 25 November, 1964