Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Manick Chandra Sardar And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 23 November, 1989

Dr. Anisur Rahman Khan vs Indian Institute Of Technology And Ors. on 18 December, 1991

In the case of Manick Chandra Sardar (supra) continuous service for more than three years on temporary basis was virtually meant to defeat the protection of continuous service to the petitioners who were entitled to be converted as permanent hands. It is certainly the duty of the IIT to see that those employed under the sponsored Schemes by different authorities under the control and administration of the IIT must be converted into permanent hands.
Calcutta High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Sri Swapan Kumar Ghosh vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 18 August, 2003

In such cases the Courts have directed regularisation subject to the fulfilment of three preconditions, namely, (a) The existence of a substantive post against which the employee concerned has served, (see: All Manipur Regular Posts Vacancies Substitute Teacher's Association v. State of Manipur (supra); Akhtar Hamid Sheikh v. D.J. Schools (supra), and Bakul Rej v. State of West Bengal (supra), (b) The employee must be otherwise qualified to be appointed to the post; (see: J.M. Puthuparambil v. Kerala Water Authority (supra) and (c) The employees must have, served continuously In the post against which regularisation is asked, for a reasonably long period, (see: Manik Chandra Sarkar v. State of West Bengal (supra) and Smt Pratima Sarkar v. State of West Bengal (supra).
Calcutta High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - I Banerjee - Full Document

Vijay Kumar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 26 April, 2011

Petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit in the case. Along with supplementary affidavit he has produced a hand written application dated 09.01.2001 addressed to the Commandant of Central Training Institute, Bihta as Annexure-5. It is claimed that petitioner had filed this application at that time itself, therefore, the application of the petitioner was not time barred. He has also produced a letter of the Commandant, Central Training Institute Bihta dated 11.05.2007, addressed to the Commandant Bihar Homeguards, in which the Commandant, Central Training Institute, Bihta has said that the petitioner had filed his application for appointment on compassionate ground soon after the death of his father. On the basis of these two 3 documents learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application of the petitioner was within five years and, therefore, as per law laid down by this Court in the case of Pinki Kumari vs. the State of Bihar and Ors.( 1997 (1) PLJR 617) and in the case of Ram Chandra Marrick vs. the State of Bihar & Ors. (2009 (2) PLJR
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1