Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing M.V.Raghavan (Membership No.1) vs The Retruning Officer on 13 March, 2009

P.G.Jayakumar vs State Co-Operative Election ... on 10 December, 2014

19. Learned counsel then contended that the remedy available to the appellant is to raise a dispute as provided under Section 69(2)(c) of the Act. Counsel also placed reliance on the judgments of the Apex Court in State of U.P. v. C.O.D. Chheoki Employees' Co-operative Society Ltd. {(1997) 3 SCC 681}, Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra {(2001) 8 SCC 509} and the judgment of this Court in Raghavan M. V. v. Returning Officer (2009) 2 KHC 47).
Kerala High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - A Dominic - Full Document

Joseph D'Cruz vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2012

13. A Division Bench of this Court has held in Raghavan M.V v. Returning Officer {2009(2) KHC 47} that where disputed questions of fact are involved the jurisdiction under Art.226 of the WPC 18798/2012 9 Constitution is not appropriate for the purpose of deciding such questions effectively. Since Sections 69 and 70A of the Kerala Co- operative Societies Rules provides an effective remedy in the form of an election petition to challenge an election if a person is aggrieved by the same, it is only appropriate that questions regarding the validity of an election are left to be determined in such proceedings. In the present case also, the question as to whether the result of the election has been materially affected by permitting the allegedly ineligible members to vote is best left to be decided in a properly framed election petition before the appropriate authority. The petitioners have a further case that 44 ineligible persons have been included in the category of eligible persons, without any justification. Therefore, the petitioners are permitted to take up their objections with respect to the said members also in their election petition.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Kuriakose - Full Document

Santhosh.T.L vs The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 30 July, 2009

2. The Managing Committee came into office on 16.08.2009 and their term normally would have expired on 15.08.2014. Admittedly after passing Exhibit P6 order, there is an Administrator appointed in the respondent-Bank. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, though there is a remedy provided under Section 82 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 for an appeal to the Kerala Co-operative Tribunal. It is apposite in this case to note the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Raghavan M.V. v. Returning Officer [2009 (2) KHC 47]:
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1