Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.35 seconds)

Kuberappa vs The Chairman on 11 October, 2019

6. On a close reading of the impugned order, it can be seen that the Tribunal has bestowed its attention to the provisions of Section 94 of the Karnataka Education Act and the decisions cited by the learned counsels. The Tribunal has taken note of the decision of this Court in the case of CATHOLIC BOARD OF EDUCATION, MANGALORE VS. THERESA D'SOUZA reported in [2002 (1) KLJ 210] wherein this Court had held that to avail the benefit of the Act in regard to the service conditions as contemplated under Section 94 of the Act, the employee must be a permanent employee. Moreover, at the threshold, the fact that the appeal was preferred by the petitioner after a lapse of 13 years was 6 sufficient to dismiss the appeal on the ground of delay and laches.
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Devdas - Full Document
1