Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 663 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing Joginder Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 16 November, 1978

Dalip Singh And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 May, 1988

50. The submission of Mr. Soni and Mr. Singhi that the decision in Joginder Singh's case 1979 Cri LJ 333 (SC) has set at rest the controversy relating to the term 'evidence' occurring in Section 319 because their Lordships have used the word 'evidence' recorded at the trial in Para 8 of the judgment, is not appearing, because, as stated earlier, in the matter before their Lordships evidence of two witnesses had already been recorded by the Sessions Judge and their Lordships were looking to the case from that angle. The important part of the judgment throwing light on the question emerging for determination before us is the observation that once the Sessions Court proceeds as a result of the committal order against some accused, the power under Section 319(1) comes into play.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 34 - Cited by 7 - A K Mathur - Full Document

Baldevbhai Govindbhai Parmar vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 5 April, 2016

This  Court in that context after  referring  to   Joginder Singh v. State of Punjab ((1979)  2 SCR 306) held that if the   prosecution  can at any stage produce  evidence  which satisfies  the Court   that  the  other  accused  or  those  who  have  not  been  arrayed  as  accused   against whom  proceedings  have  been quashed,  have  also committed  the   offence, the Court can take cognizance against them and try them along   with the other accused. This Court thus upheld the power of the Court to  invoke   S.   319   of   the   Code   even   in   such   a   case.   Their   Lordships   then   added :
Gujarat High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 0 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Latfur Rahman And Ors. vs State on 17 May, 1985

It would run against the grist of the ratio and the binding authority of Joginder Singh's case and Hareram Satpathy's case to hold that the new Code by enacting Section 319 has overriden the statutory enunciation of the rule in Raghubans Dubey's case and, indeed, it is evident that Satyanarayan Yadav's case is no longer good law can this point in view of these later decisions of the Supreme Court.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next