Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.36 seconds)
Documents citing Shankar Lal vs Sh. Thambu Ram on 24 September, 1999

Vide This Order vs Gopi Ram E No.5/10 Page 1 /7 on 5 January, 2013

Co. Pvt. Ltd.; MANU/DE/0670/1992, S. K. Gupta Vs. R. C. Rajinder Kumar Gupta vs Gopi Ram E No.5/10 Page 5 /7 Jain; AIR 1984 Delhi 187, K. K. Ohri Vs. Dr. Balraj Seth; 2000 (1) RCR 66, Om Prakash Vs. Dev Raj Kohli; 1997 (2) RCR 318, Anil Kumar Vs. Harpal Singh Banwait and another; 2008(1) RCR (Rent) 638, Extracts from 'The Notaries Rules 1956"; Rule 15, Maganlal Vs. Nanasaheb; Civil Appeal No.6125 of 2008, Shiv Sarup Gupta Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta; MANU/SC/0432/1999, Hira Lala Kapoor Vs. Prabhu Choudhury; 1988 (2) RCJ 1, B. K. Khanna Vs. M. R. Batra; 1988 (2) RCJ 91, Shanker Lal Vs. Sh.Thambu Ram;
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Pushpa Tandon vs Smt. Bimla Sharma on 20 October, 2007

One of the contention of Ld. Counsel for petitioner was that baby Kanika, dauther of petitioner no. 4 is studying at Neev School, 17-B MIG, Pocket A, GTB Enclave, Delhi and has relied upon the progress report of baby Kanika. But there is no denial of this progress report filed on 17.9.05 before filing of rejoinder. On this score Ld. Counsel for petitioner has stated that the respondent is denying each and every fact without ascertaining the true facts and leave to contest should not be granted in these circumstances. Reliance is made in case Shankar Lal vs. Thambu Ram, 2000 RLR (Note) 17, wherein Hon'ble High Court has, inter alia, held that the tenant who had denied every allegation was callous enough to deny that daughter of the landlord had became a widow. ........... There has to be some limit to ingenuity.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Joginder Kaur vs (1). Sh. Ghanshyam Kodwani on 9 July, 2010

On this, I am supported by various case law authorities, for example, in the case of Shanker Lal v. Thambu Ram 2000 RLR (Note) 17; in which it was held that ­ " Delhi Rent Control Act, S. 14 (1) (e) r.w. S. 25 B. A tenant who goes to the extent of denying landlord's daughter becoming widow and raises wrong pleas through filing a Site Plan is not entitled to leave to defend. There has to be some limit to ingenuity of tenant's defence."
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1