Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Secretary To Advocate General vs State Information Commission on 30 September, 2022

Union Of India And Anr vs Subhash Chandra Agrawal on 20 December, 2023

Lastly, to establish that work under such a relationship would be termed a fiduciary relationship, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner relied upon the judgment passed by the Kerala High Court in Secretary to Advocate General v State Information Commissioner and Ors, 2022 SCC Online Ker 4844, wherein it was observed that the relationship between an Advocate General of a State and the Government of that State is in the nature of a fiduciary relationship and the opinions tendered by the Advocate General would be exempted under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - S Prasad - Full Document

Nilesh Pathak vs Ministry Of Defence on 25 April, 2023

In this regard, it is trite to mention that the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the decision of Secretary to Advocate General v. Kerala State Information 2 Commission, WP(C) 7240/2013, dated 30.09.2022 has held that the legal advice rendered by the Advocate General to the Government is exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act, 2005 as the relationship between the two constituted a fiduciary relationship. The relevant observations are reproduced below:
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - V N Sarna - Full Document
1