Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)

Vidyut Metallics P.Ltd, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 19 March, 2019

Further, it is noted that the cited decision of Mumbai Tribunal in Mukund Ltd. Vs. ITO [supra] has not considered any of the above decisions. Therefore, respectfully following the judicial wisdom of Hon'ble High Courts, we confirm the view taken by first appellate authority in the impugned order and hold that interest on late payment of TDS could not be allowed to the assessee u/s 37(1). We order so. The ground stands dismissed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mukund Limited, Mumbai vs Ito 3(2)(2), Mumbai on 3 July, 2019

Mukund Ltd. Vs. ITO-3(2)(2), Mumbai (ITA No. 679/Mum/2011, P a g e |4 M.A. No. 104/Mum/2019 A.Y. 2004-05 (Arising out of ITA No.679/Mum/2011) Mukund Limited Vs. The Income Tax Officer-3(2)(2) dated 05.12.2018) for A.Y. 2004-05 is recalled for the limited purpose of readjudicating the "Ground of appeal No. 3" after considering the aforesaid two judicial pronouncements viz.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mukund Limited, Mumbai vs Ito 3(2)(2), Mumbai on 24 October, 2019

The present application filed by the assessee arises from the order passed by the Tribunal while disposing off its appeal i.e Mukund Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer-3(2)(2), Mumbai (ITA No.679/Mum/2011, dated 05.12.2018) for A.Y. 2004-05. As is discernible from the application, the same refers to certain mistakes, which as claimed by the assessee arises from the "Ground of appeal No.1"that was raised before the Tribunal, and read as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1