Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20398 (2.36 seconds)
Documents citing Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai ... vs The State Of Gujarat on 4 October, 2017

Mohd Yunus vs State & Anr. on 8 November, 2019

In view of the detailed reasoning given above, this court is of the opinion that FIR cannot be quashed for the reason that the petitioner has cheated the DDA and caused loss to the public exchequer by not paying unearned increase deliberately and in view of the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur & Ors.(Supra), the offences CRL.M.C. 3861/2010 Page 15 of 16 which affects the economy of the nation and are against the society, cannot be quashed.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr. Subhash Thakur vs State Of H.P. And Another on 12 February, 2021

They are offences of a personal nature and burying them would bring about peace and amity between the two sides. In the circumstances of the case, FIR No. 163 dated 26.10.2006 registered under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 452 and 506 of the IPC at Police Station Sector 3, Chandigarh and all consequential proceedings arising there from including the final report presented under Section 173 of the Code and charges framed by the trial Court are hereby quashed." 10. Recently the Hon'ble Apex Court in its latest judgment dated 4th October, 2017, titled as Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and Another, passed in Criminal Appeal No.1723 of 2017 arising out of SLP(Crl) No.9549 of 2016, reiterated the principles/ parameters laid down in Narinder Singh's case supra for accepting the settlement and quashing the proceedings. It would be profitable to reproduce para No. 13 to 15 of the judgment herein
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 4 - J R Dua - Full Document

Major Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 21 November, 2025

In view of the report of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Zira and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in 'Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another (2017) 9 SCC 641', the instant petition is allowed. The FIR 8 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 13-12-2025 02:03:51 ::: CRM-M-50951-2025 (O&M) -9- No.0062 dated 07.06.2024, under Sections 452, 324, 323, 427, 506, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Makhu, Dis- trict Ferozepur and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed in view of compromise dated 08.08.2024 (Annexure P-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ankit Kumar @ Ankit (As Per Fir) vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 22 December, 2023

16.5. The decision as to whether a complaint or first information report should be quashed on the ground that the offender and victim have settled the dispute, revolves ultimately on the facts and circumstances of each case and no exhaustive elaboration of principles can be formulated. This extract is taken from Parbatbhai Aanir v. State of Gujarat, (2017) 9 SCC 641: (2018) 1 SCC (Cri) 1: 2017 SCC OnLine SC 1189 at page 653 16.6. In the exercise of the power under Section 482 while dealing with a plea that the dispute has been settled, the High Court must have due regard to the nature and gravity of the offence. Heinous and serious offences involving mental depravity or offences such as murder, rape and dacoity cannot appropriately be quashed though the victim or the family of the victim have settled the dispute. Such offences are, truly speaking, not private in nature but have a serious impact upon society. The decision to continue with the trial in such cases is founded on the overriding element of public interest in punishing persons for serious offences.
Allahabad High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next