citedby: 73066872

Ram Pratap Yadav @ R.P. Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 27 March, 2025

11. This Court by its judgment and order dated 22.05.2023 passed in Application under Section 482 No. 41830 of 2022 (Arvind Yadav vs. State of U.P. and Anr.). The relevant paragraphs of the same are quoted hereinbelow:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Gulzar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. ... on 26 May, 2025

10. This Court by its judgment and order dated 22.05.2023 passed in Application under Section 482 No. 41830 of 2022 (Arvind Yadav vs. State of U.P. and Anr.). The relevant paragraphs of the same are quoted hereinbelow:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Mukhtiyar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko ... on 26 May, 2025

10. This Court by its judgment and order dated 22.05.2023 passed in Application under Section 482 No. 41830 of 2022 (Arvind Yadav vs. State of U.P. and Anr.). The relevant paragraphs of the same are quoted hereinbelow:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Arvind Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 16 October, 2024

The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 30.09.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 28790 of 2021 (Arvind Yadav vs. State of U.P. and another).

Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Ajit Singh And 11 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 30 April, 2025

10. It is not a case of the petitioner here that rules do not have statutory force or there were no rule at all. The Division Bench in the case of Arvind Yadav (Supra) also held very clearly that in the absence of provisions under the relevant rules of preparation of waiting list, no recognition can be granted by the Court of preparation of waiting list. Even if it is said, rules are silent, yet the petitioners have failed to place before this Court any executive instructions so that it may be said as a rule providing for additional list to the merit list.

Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Balinder Yadav And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 11 March, 2025

4. Today, learned counsel for the respondent has stated that since the matter is squarely covered by a decision of this Court dated 22.9.2021 passed in Special Appeal Defective No. 421 of 2021 (Arvind Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others), he does not proposes to file a counter affidavit and the case may be disposed of at this stage itself.

Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Banerji - Full Document

Search Results Page