Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.74 seconds)
Documents citing K.P. Sachidananda And Ors. vs State Of Karnataka, Revenue Department ... on 18 December, 2003

Prahlad Singh & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 April, 2011

In P.K. Kalburqi v. State of Karnataka (2005) 12 SCC 489, the Court referred to the observations made by Bhagwati, J. in Balwant Narayan Bhagde v. M.D. Bhagwat (supra) that no hard and fast rule can be laid down as to what act would be sufficient to constitute taking of possession of the acquired land and observed that when there is no crop or structure on the land only symbolic possession could be taken.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 92 - Full Document

Sita Ram Bhandar Society, New Delhi vs Lt.Governor,Govt.Of Nct Delhi & Ors on 15 September, 2009

In P.K.Kalburqi's case (supra), a reference was made to the judgment in Narayan Bhagde's case (supra) and it was once again reiterated that the procedure for taking possession would depend upon the nature of the land and the extent thereof. A cumulative reading of the aforesaid judgments would reveal that while taking symbolic and notional 16 CA Nos.4849-4850/2000 possession is perhaps not envisaged under the Act but the manner in which possession is taken must of necessity depend upon the facts of each case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 135 - H S Bedi - Full Document

Banda Development Authy, Banda vs Moti Lal Agarwal & Ors on 26 April, 2011

In P.K. Kalburqi v. State of Karnataka (2005) 12 SCC 489, the Court referred to the observations made by Bhagwati, J. in Balwant Narayan Bhagde v. M.D. Bhagwat (supra) that no hard and fast rule can be laid down as to what act would be sufficient to constitute taking of possession of the acquired land and observed that when there is no crop or structure on the land only symbolic possession could be taken.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 181 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1   2 Next