Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (7.32 seconds)
Documents citing Krishan Kumar vs Union Territory Of Chandigarh And Ors. on 2 December, 2002

Ms. Sonika Kohli And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 27 August, 2003

11. There is yet another aspect of the matter. The teachers appointed on contract basis have taken up the assignment knowing it full well that they are to be substituted and replaced by the regularly selected teachers. Earlier on the expiry of the term of contract appointment, when it was not proposed to be extended, a chain of litigation ensued. Matter was considered by this Bench, Punjab & Haryana High Court as well as the Supreme Court in different cases filed by the contract teachers. All these cases have been discussed in Krishan Kumar's case. The firm legal position which flows from the various decisions is that all the contract appointees are subject to replacement and substitution by the teachers appointed on regular basis in accordance with statutory rules. Some of the present applicants have prayed for a direction to the respondents to regularise their services after framing a scheme. If this prayer is allowed it would tantamount to setting at naught and rendering nugatory all the decisions rendered in the past. The various decisions on which reliance has been placed by the learned Counsel for the applicants who have claimed regularisation of their services are not applicable to the facts of the case, particularly keeping in view the statutory rules.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 17 - Cited by 23 - Full Document

Vandana Jain D/O Kasturilal Jain Aged 31 ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary To ... on 31 March, 2011

iv)In view of the categorical law laid down by the learned Coordinate Bench in KRISHAN KUMAR VS. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & OTHERS (supra) (wherein appropriate sustenance was drawn from the view obtained by the Apex Court in RATTAN LAL & OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. FEMALE WORKERS (MUSTER ROLL) AND ANOTHER(supra), and also a Division Bench ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of RAJ BALA VS. STATE OF HARYANA : 2002(3) RSJ (43) ), all the contractual lecturers shall be entitled to minimum of the pay scale of the post, with Dearness Allowance, as admissible from time to time and also the maternity leave to the extent indicated in that judgment (Krishan Kumars case). The benefit of maternity leave would be available to a female contractual employee, with less than two surviving children. The duration thereof would be the same as has been recommended by the VIth Central Pay Commission.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 12 - Cited by 22 - Full Document

Mrs. Shivani Batra Daughter Of Shri M.L. ... vs Chandigarh Administration on 15 December, 2011

(iii) In view of the categorical law laid down by the learned Coordinate Bench in KRISHAN KUMAR VS. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & OTHERS (supra) (wherein appropriate sustenance was drawn from the view obtained by the Apex Court in RATTAN LAL & OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. FEMALE WORKERS (MUSTER ROLL) AND ANOTHER(supra), and also a Division Bench ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of RAJ BALA VS. STATE OF HARYANA : 2002(3) RSJ (43) ), all the contractual lecturers shall be entitled to minimum of the pay scale of the post, with Dearness Allowance, as admissible from time to time and also the maternity leave to the extent indicated in that judgment (Krishan Kumars case). The benefit of maternity leave would be available to a female contractual employee, with less than two surviving children. The duration thereof would be the same as has been recommended by the VIth Central Pay Commission.(underlining for emphasis)
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Unknown vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 30 May, 2011

26. We would, then, proceed to take up the grievance of the applicants qua denial of salary for the vacation period. The denial of salary for the vacation period to the contractual lecturers (for whatever reasons) is invalid in view of the law laid down by a learned Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in KRISHAN KUMAR VS. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH : 2004(3) (CAT) 229.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jagtar Chand vs Union Territory on 1 October, 2012

iv) In view of the categorical law laid down by the learned Coordinate Bench in KRISHAN KUMAR VS. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & OTHERS (supra) (wherein appropriate sustenance was drawn from the view obtained by the Apex Court in RATTAN LAL & OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. FEMALE WORKERS (MUSTER ROLL) AND ANOTHER(supra), and also a Division Bench ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of RAJ BALA VS. STATE OF HARYANA : 2002(3) RSJ (43) ), all the contractual lecturers shall be entitled to minimum of the pay scale of the post, with Dearness Allowance, as admissible from time to time and also the maternity leave to the extent indicated in that judgment (Krishan Kumars case). The benefit of maternity leave would be available to a female contractual employee, with less than two surviving children. The duration thereof would be the same as has been recommended by the VIth Central Pay Commission.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Annie vs Education Deptt., Ut Chandigarh on 3 April, 2025

iv) In view of the categorical law laid down by the learned Coordinate Bench in KRISHAN KUMAR VS. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & OTHERS (supra) (wherein appropriate sustenance was drawn from the view obtained by the Apex Court in RATTAN LAL & OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. FEMALE WORKERS (MUSTER ROLL) AND ANOTHER(supra), and also a Division Bench ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of RAJ BALA VS. STATE OF HARYANA : 2002(3) RSJ (43) ), all the contractual lecturers shall be entitled to minimum of the pay scale of the post, with Dearness Allowance, as admissible from time to time and also the maternity leave to the extent indicated in that judgment (Krishan Kumars case). The benefit of maternity leave would be available to a female contractual employee, with less than two surviving children. The duration thereof would be the same as has been recommended by the VIth Central Pay Commission."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jasmer Singh S/O Sh. Bhagat Singh vs Union Territory on 1 April, 2013

8.Likewise, our view therein invalidating the denial of salary to the contractual employees for the vacation period was in accord with the view obtained by a learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in Krishan Kumar Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh : 2004 (3) (CAT) 229 which (view) came to be affirmed (though in another matter) by the Honble Supreme Court in Chandigarh Administration through Joint Secretary Education Vs. Meenakshi Walia & Another (Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 15478/1999 in the judgment and order dated 20.8.1999 in WP 11669/99 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Meenu Kamboj vs Education Deptt., Ut Chandigarh on 7 May, 2019

In a subsequent decision in the case of Vandana Jain ( supra), where the similarly placed persons approached this Court for grant of minimum pay scale of the post with DA as admissible from time to time and also maternity leave to the extent indicated in the case of Krishan Kumar versus Union Territory of Chandigarh & Ors (2004(3) S.L.J. 229(CAT) was also allowed by this Court vide order dated 31.3.2011, which recorded findings in para 47, as under:-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Ms. Neeru vs Union Territory on 17 December, 2012

iv) In view of the categorical law laid down by the learned Coordinate Bench in Krishan Kumar Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh & Others (supra) (wherein appropriate sustenance was drawn from the view obtained by the Apex Court in Rattan Lal & Others Vs. State of Haryana & Others, Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Female Workers (Muster Roll) and Another (Supra), and also a Division Bench ruling of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Raj Bala Vs. State of Haryana: 2002 (3) RSJ (43) ), all the contractual lecturers shall be entitled to minimum of the pay scale of the post, with Dearness Allowance, as admissible from time to time and also the maternity leave to the extent indicated in that judgment (Krishan Kumars case). The benefit of maternity leave would be available to a female contractual employee, with less than two surviving children. The duration thereof would be the same as has been recommended by the VIth Central Pay Commission.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next