Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 456 (2.85 seconds)
Documents citing Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd vs M/S Dewan Chand Ram Saran on 25 April, 2012

Chamaria Fashions Pvt. Ltd vs Aniket Basant Agrawal on 9 June, 2023

In Parsa Kente Collieries Limited v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited10, adverting to the previous decisions of this Court in McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. And Others11 and Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. V. Dewan Chand Ram Saran12, wherein it has been observed that an Arbitral Tribunal must decide in accordance with the terms of the contract, but if a term of the contract has been construed in a reasonable manner, then the award ought not to be set aside on this ground, it has been held thus:
Gujarat High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - A J Shastri - Full Document

Smt. Balwant Kaur Mangat, Ghaziabad vs Ito, Ghaziabad on 8 August, 2017

It is also true that for the purpose of stamp duty valuation. The property has been valued in Rs. 35,11,704/-. The provisions of section 50C are clearly applicable in this case as it is a case of transfer of property through sale deed at a price lower than the value adopted for stamp duty valuation. The case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. (Supra) does not apply to the facts of the case as it was in a different context that the intention is material. In the facts of this case, the registered sale deed is the best evidence to ascertain the actual 11 nature of transaction. Had the assessee intended to transfer the asset through a gift she could have very well drawn at gift deed. When allegedly no money has been received from the transferee there was no need to mention so in the sale deed. Therefore, the contention regarding it being a gift is not tenable.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Shiam Cooperative Group vs M/S. Kamal Construction Co. Ltd on 10 August, 2017

In Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306 , the Court held: (SCC pp. 320-21, paras 43-45) ―43. In any case, assuming that Clause 9.3 was capable of two interpretations, the view taken by the arbitrator was clearly a possible if not a plausible one. It is not possible to say that the arbitrator had travelled outside his jurisdiction, or that the view taken by him was against the terms of contract. That being the position, the High Court had no reason to interfere with the award and substitute its view in place of the interpretation accepted by the arbitrator.
Delhi High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 8 - C H Shankar - Full Document

M/S Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd vs M/S Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd on 9 June, 2017

106. In so far as the evidence of Mr.Athaley relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondent in support of his submission that his evidence amounted to an admission within the meaning of Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act is concerned, a perusal of the oral evidence of Mr.Athaley clearly support the case of the petitioner and not the respondent. Reliance thus placed on Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act by the respondent is totally misplaced. The judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Avadh Kishore Vs.Ram Gopal (supra) thus would not assist the case of the respondent and is clearly distinguishable in the facts of this case. Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act also is not attracted to the facts of this case and thus reliance placed thereon is totally misplaced.
Bombay High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 11 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Neelkanth Mansions And Infrastructure ... vs Urban Infrastructure Ventures Capital ... on 7 December, 2018

285. The judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Payal Chawla Singh Vs. Coca-Cola Co., (2015) 13 SCC 699, in 168 ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 29/12/2018 08:36:00 ::: carbp13-17g.doc case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited vs. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306 and in case of Reliance Industries Limited vs. Balasore Alloys Limited, 2014 SCC OnLine Bom 43 relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the respondent no.4 would assist the case of the respondent no.4 and would apply to the facts of this case.
Bombay High Court Cites 70 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Neelkanth Mansions And Infrastructure ... vs Urban Infrastructure Ventures Capital ... on 7 December, 2018

285. The judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Payal Chawla Singh Vs. Coca-Cola Co., (2015) 13 SCC 699, in 168 ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 29/12/2018 08:37:04 ::: carbp13-17g.doc case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited vs. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306 and in case of Reliance Industries Limited vs. Balasore Alloys Limited, 2014 SCC OnLine Bom 43 relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the respondent no.4 would assist the case of the respondent no.4 and would apply to the facts of this case.
Bombay High Court Cites 70 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Neelkanth Mansions And Infrastructure ... vs Urban Infrastructure Ventures Capital ... on 7 December, 2018

285. The judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Payal Chawla Singh Vs. Coca-Cola Co., (2015) 13 SCC 699, in 168 ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 29/12/2018 08:38:07 ::: carbp13-17g.doc case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited vs. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306 and in case of Reliance Industries Limited vs. Balasore Alloys Limited, 2014 SCC OnLine Bom 43 relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the respondent no.4 would assist the case of the respondent no.4 and would apply to the facts of this case.
Bombay High Court Cites 70 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Neelkanth Mansions And Infrastructure ... vs Urban Infrastructure Ventures Capital ... on 7 December, 2018

285. The judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Payal Chawla Singh Vs. Coca-Cola Co., (2015) 13 SCC 699, in 168 ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 29/12/2018 08:38:26 ::: carbp13-17g.doc case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited vs. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306 and in case of Reliance Industries Limited vs. Balasore Alloys Limited, 2014 SCC OnLine Bom 43 relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the respondent no.4 would assist the case of the respondent no.4 and would apply to the facts of this case.
Bombay High Court Cites 70 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Neelkanth Mansions And Infrastructure ... vs Urban Infrastructure Ventures Capital ... on 7 December, 2018

285. The judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Payal Chawla Singh Vs. Coca-Cola Co., (2015) 13 SCC 699, in 168 ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 29/12/2018 08:38:44 ::: carbp13-17g.doc case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited vs. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306 and in case of Reliance Industries Limited vs. Balasore Alloys Limited, 2014 SCC OnLine Bom 43 relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the respondent no.4 would assist the case of the respondent no.4 and would apply to the facts of this case.
Bombay High Court Cites 70 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Mrs. Navneet Kaur And Ors vs S. Inder Mohan Singh And Ors on 13 October, 2023

(20) In the case of Parsa Kente Collieries Limited Vs. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited reported in 2019 (7) SCC 236, adverting to the previous decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court in McDermott International Inc. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Others reported in 2006 (11) SCC 181 and Navneet Kaur & Ors. Vs. Inder Mohan Singh & Ors., OMP (Comm) No. 30/2019, Judgment dated 13.10.2023 Page No. 36 of 75 Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. Vs. Dewan Chand Ram Saran reported in 2012 (5) SCC 306, it has been observed that an Arbitral Tribunal must decide in accordance with the terms of the contract, but if a term of the contract has been construed in a reasonable manner, then the award ought not to be set aside on this ground, it has been held as under:
Delhi District Court Cites 92 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next